1980
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.119727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rest termination and prediction models for low chilling blueberries and nectarines /

Abstract: Floral bud-break of 'Sungold' nectarine plants held for 5 chilling durations at chilling temperatures of 10°C plus 2 weeks at 30°C and continuous 10°C 4. Temperaturechill unit model for 'Sungold' nectarine (550 hr) with Utah high chilling model for comparison 5. Average weekly scaffold temperatures of control and sprinkled 'Sungold' and 'Sunlite' nectarine trees 6. Floral and vegetative bud-break on 'Sungold' nectarine trees, 1978-79 7.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After CR evaluation based on the < 7.2°C model had been completed, CR of each genotype was recalculated based on the 0-7.2°C model (Eggert, 1951), the Utah model (Richardson et al, 1974), the Low Chill model (Gilreath & Buchanan, 1981) and the Dynamic model (Fishman et al, 1987;Erez et al, 1988 Richardson et al (1975). GDHs for a specific genotype were determined by subtracting 4.5°C (below which no growth or development of peach buds occurs) from the hourly temperature, and accumulating the balance from the time of CR completion to full bloom.…”
Section: Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After CR evaluation based on the < 7.2°C model had been completed, CR of each genotype was recalculated based on the 0-7.2°C model (Eggert, 1951), the Utah model (Richardson et al, 1974), the Low Chill model (Gilreath & Buchanan, 1981) and the Dynamic model (Fishman et al, 1987;Erez et al, 1988 Richardson et al (1975). GDHs for a specific genotype were determined by subtracting 4.5°C (below which no growth or development of peach buds occurs) from the hourly temperature, and accumulating the balance from the time of CR completion to full bloom.…”
Section: Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High temperatures above a limit are considered to reverse the chilling effects of lower temperatures, and negative chill units are assessed for them (Cesaraccio et al, 2004). The Utah model (Richardson et al, 1974) and Low Chill model (Gilreath & Buchanan, 1981) are two popular CU models in temperate regions (Cesaraccio et al, 2004).…”
Section: Influence Of Cr Evaluation Models On Cr Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment we used the Utah model (Richardson et al, 1974) to compare the chill units of our peach cultivars and selection. More optimal rest prediction models have been developed for low-chilling nectarines and peaches (Gilreath and Buchanan, 1981b;Lu et al, 2012). Therefore, it may be effective to use a model specific for low-chill cultivars to obtain a more accurate prediction of blooming dates for 'Okinawa 1'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second uses the hours below 8.4 "C for estimating available chilling. It is based upon the findings of Erez & Couvillon (1987) and Gilreath & Buchanan (1981) that the optimum temperature for satisfying chilling is 8.0 "C. The third uses the hours below 8.4 "C, together with half the hours between 8.5 to 10.4 "C, for estimating available chilling. It is based on many researchers' findings that temperatures up to approximately 10.O°C have some effect in breaking rest.…”
Section: Selection Of Criteria For Chilling Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%