2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RESQUE: A novel comprehensive approach to compare the performance of different indices in evaluating seagrass health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Box status has been plotted on radar charts and the uniformity of box status has been assessed through circularity of polygons representing those charts. Circularity is the ratio between the polygon area and the area of a circle having a circumference equal to the polygon perimeter (Oprandi et al, 2021). Perimeter and area have been calculated using ArcGIS Pro 3.0 ® .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Box status has been plotted on radar charts and the uniformity of box status has been assessed through circularity of polygons representing those charts. Circularity is the ratio between the polygon area and the area of a circle having a circumference equal to the polygon perimeter (Oprandi et al, 2021). Perimeter and area have been calculated using ArcGIS Pro 3.0 ® .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine a relevant biological indicator, the main issue is finding the balance between the most suitable descriptors versus the feasibility of methods of implementation according to available human and material resources. Unlike ecosystems of priority interest such as Posidonia oceanica meadows (Montefalcone, 2009;Lopez y Royo et al, 2010;Personnic et al, 2014;Oprandi et al, 2021), no indices or descriptors are available for the functional or ecosystem-based analysis of CDB.…”
Section: An Original Ecosystem-based Quality Index For Coastal Detrit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last decades, a vast array of biotic indices has been developed to this purpose, mostly as a consequence of European Directives [197]. Indices have been devised based on indicators at different ecological complexity levels [198,199]: indices working at individual level take into account the phenology of a key species (e.g., a seagrass); indices at population level use abundance, spatial extent, density or size distribution frequency of a key species; indices at community level consider taxonomic composition, diversity, and the sensibility of different species towards environmental quality; indices at ecosystem level are based on the identification of functional compartments (e.g., in the food web) and on the evaluation of the status of each of them; indices at seascape level typify and quantify different elements and their spatial configuration, paying special attention to the morpho-structural traits of the species. Among the most utilized indices are CARLIT (Cartography of Littoral and upper-sublittoral benthic communities), for shallow water algal-dominated reefs [200], PREI [Posidonia Rapid Easy Index], for Posidonia oceanica meadows [201], ESCA (Ecological Status of Coralligenous Assemblages), for coralligenous reefs [202].…”
Section: What To Monitor?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these indices are multimetric, combining and integrating several individual indices [203]. Integrated indices are more appealing to environmental managers and administrators, who see in them a clear and synthetic indication of the health state of the habitat in question; however, multimetric indices homogenize the different components and may hide the specific nature of alteration [199,204]. Averaging low-values and high-values of distinct metrics may result in a "mediocre" synthetic value [85], which is not informative about the real ecological status of the habitat.…”
Section: What To Monitor?mentioning
confidence: 99%