2016
DOI: 10.12804/apl34.3.2016.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respuestas psicofisiológicas ante estímulos asociados al tabaco: Diferencias entre fumadores y no fumadores

Abstract: Las respuestas emocionales y motivacionales son fundamentales para explicar el inicio y mantenimiento del consumo de tabaco, sin embargo, los resultados con respecto a las diferencias en fumadores y no fumadores de las respuestas psicofisiológicas que sirven como marcadores neurofisiológicos de procesos emocionales y motivacionales presentan resultados contradictorios. El objetivo de esta investigación fue identificar las diferencias en las respuestas psicofisiológicas ante estímulos asociados al tabaco en fum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our self-report ratings, however, support the notion that, unlike smokers, never-smokers find cigarette-related cues unpleasant (Engelmann et al, 2011; Robinson et al, 2016; Robinson et al, 2015). These findings are also supported by studies that measured peripheral physiology and showed that in never-smokers, cigarette-related cues elicited responses similar to those evoked by unpleasant stimuli (Dempsey et al, 2007; Gantiva et al, 2016; Geier et al, 2000). The moderate, negative correlation between LPP amplitude and self-reported valence ratings of cigarette-related cues further supports the conclusion that never-smokers maintain enhanced ERP responses to cigarette-related cues because they perceive them as unpleasant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Our self-report ratings, however, support the notion that, unlike smokers, never-smokers find cigarette-related cues unpleasant (Engelmann et al, 2011; Robinson et al, 2016; Robinson et al, 2015). These findings are also supported by studies that measured peripheral physiology and showed that in never-smokers, cigarette-related cues elicited responses similar to those evoked by unpleasant stimuli (Dempsey et al, 2007; Gantiva et al, 2016; Geier et al, 2000). The moderate, negative correlation between LPP amplitude and self-reported valence ratings of cigarette-related cues further supports the conclusion that never-smokers maintain enhanced ERP responses to cigarette-related cues because they perceive them as unpleasant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Consumers' habituation to visual stimuli related to the substance occurs due to the high exposure to social and environmental stimuli that present positive or negative cigarette consumption effects. It may explain the tendency to decrease the psychophysiological response emitted before images, directly and indirectly, related to the use of the substance since these are not always cognitively processed and initiate a neutral effect in all consumers, as shown by Teixeira do Carmo et al (2005), Gantiva et al (2016), Tonkin and Hawk (2020), and García-Gonzalez et al (2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the startle response is expected to be significantly different for the different smoking levels described in the SCS, confirming the characterization proposed by Londoño et al (2017) in said system. Hence, this study's objective was to perform the differential validation for each smoker level described in the SCS of Londoño et al (2017) using the startle reflex caused by tobacco-related cues as a standard measure, previously validated by Gantiva et al (2016) in the Colombian population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%