2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4682-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing motor and cognitive rehabilitation

Abstract: The TSK was sensitive in detecting clinical changes in subjects with chronic low back pain. We recommend taking the MICs provided into account when assessing patients' improvement or planning studies in this clinical context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas both groups showed baseline Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia scores around the cutoff to indicate kinesiophobia, only the experimental group showed decreases exceeding the minimally important change of 5.5 (large effect sizes). 36 Similarly, hypervigilance improved more in the experimental group (medium to large effect sizes) than in the control group. Again, the combination of pain neuroscience education with cognition-targeted exercises reveals its added value, as previous research indicates that pain neuroscience education alone did not significantly reduce hypervigilance.…”
Section: Figure Consort Flow Diagrammentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whereas both groups showed baseline Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia scores around the cutoff to indicate kinesiophobia, only the experimental group showed decreases exceeding the minimally important change of 5.5 (large effect sizes). 36 Similarly, hypervigilance improved more in the experimental group (medium to large effect sizes) than in the control group. Again, the combination of pain neuroscience education with cognition-targeted exercises reveals its added value, as previous research indicates that pain neuroscience education alone did not significantly reduce hypervigilance.…”
Section: Figure Consort Flow Diagrammentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Three studies reported on the short‐term outcomes of fear of movement or kinesiophobia (Malfliet et al., ; Pires et al., ; Tellez‐Garcia et al., ) utilizing the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. The weighted mean group difference was 4.72 (95% CI 2.32, 7.13) in favour of PNE ( p = 0.0001; please see Figure ); however, this was clinically insignificant falling short of the required 5.5 points to demonstrate a minimal clinically important change in CLBP (Monticone, Ambrosini, Rocca, Foti, & Ferrante, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is also a high degree of heterogeneity (I 2 = 95%). k For a continuous outcome; there is a small sample size (<400) resulting in imprecision; further the effect size confidence interval is smaller than the minimal important difference (5.5 (Monticone et al., )). l There is a significant variety in effect size and direction between the two studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo que se deduce de los datos es que la intensidad del dolor incrementa la interferencia del dolor y, en consecuencia: a) se incrementa la incapacidad de la corteza prefontal para afrontar los desafíos del ambiente (2,84), y b) se incrementa el estrés percibido por el sujeto, lo que en última instancia provoca más incapacidad de la corteza prefrontal para gobernar la conducta, gestionar las cogniciones y controlar las emociones. Lo que sugieren los datos es que en el tratamiento integral del dolor crónico deben implementarse intervenciones psicológicas centradas en la mejora del afrontamiento del estrés (40-42) y centradas en la optimización cognitiva de las habilidades relacionadas con el funcionamiento prefrontal (43,44) de cara a mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified