Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis

Tveitå, Einar Kristian; Ekeberg, Ole Marius; Juel, Niels Gunnar; Bautz‐Holter, Erik

doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-161

Cited by 67 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Cronbach's alpha found in other studies ranged between 0.90 and 0.95 [5,[26][27][28]30], and ICC values ranged between 0.88 and 0.94 [6,7,[30][31][32], both consistent with ours.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

The Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): a reliability and validation study

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Cronbach's alpha found in other studies ranged between 0.90 and 0.95 [5,[26][27][28]30], and ICC values ranged between 0.88 and 0.94 [6,7,[30][31][32], both consistent with ours.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

The Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): a reliability and validation study

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Weighted average intra-and inter-rater reliability for PROM is, respectively, excellent and good with goniometers, with weighted average intrarater SEM of 6u. 17,23,24 Finally, inclinometers are highly responsive for measuring change for active and passive IR ROM (SRM>1.29; n575) in patients with adhesive capsulitis, 18 and goniometers are moderately responsive (ES50.56) following shoulder arthroplasty (n594). 20…”

Section: Internal Rotationmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…11,15,17 No SEM was found for PROM. Finally, in patients with adhesive capsulitis, inclinometers are highly responsive in measuring change for abduction (SRM>0.91) (n575, A/PROM), 18 and goniometers are highly responsive (ES51.88) following shoulder arthroplasty (n594). 20…”

Section: Abductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…15,17 Finally, inclinometers are highly responsive in measuring change for passive and active ROM of flexion (SRM>0. 99) in patients with adhesive capsulitis (n575), 18 while, for AROM, goniometers are moderately responsive (SRM50. 66,ES50.56) in patients with various shoulder disorders (n5107), 19 and highly responsive (ES51.25) following shoulder arthroplasty (n594).…”

Section: Flexionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric evidence for clinical outcome measures assessing shoulder disorders

Roy

Esculier

2011

Physical Therapy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A wide range of outcome measures is available for the assessment of individuals with shoulder disorders. Since outcome measures are used to orientate treatment decision-making, clinicians must make sure that the ones they intend to use present adequate properties for their clinical purpose. Objectives: To review the psychometric evidence relating to five categories of shoulder outcome measures: range of motion, scapular position and motion, strength, functional performance, and self-report questionnaires. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness were reviewed for each category. Major findings: For most of the shoulder outcomes reviewed, evidence relating to relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients) and construct validity was favorable. Globally, intrarater and test-retest reliability indices were excellent, while interrater indices were good to excellent. Favorable evidence on responsiveness (effect size, standardized response mean, clinically important difference) and absolute reliability (minimal detectable change) was also found for self-report questionnaires. However, for range of motion, scapular position and motion, strength and functional performance tests, evidence on responsiveness and absolute reliability was limited or non-existent. Conclusions: Self-reported scales, such as the DASH, ASES, WORC, or WOSI, should be first line tests as they are highly responsive. Furthermore, they are the only shoulder outcomes for which most useful clinical benchmarks are established, such as minimal detectable change or clinically important difference. As for more conventional measures such as range of motion and strength, while still clinically relevant, they require further investigations to define their responsiveness, minimal detectable change, or clinically important difference.

show abstract

“…Norwegian versions of SPADI, WORC, and OSS have been culturally adapted according to the guidelines in the literature [14,15].…”

Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease

Ekeberg

Bautz‐Holter

Keller

et al. 2010

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis

Cited by 67 publications

References 42 publications

The Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): a reliability and validation study

The Dutch Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): a reliability and validation study

Psychometric evidence for clinical outcome measures assessing shoulder disorders

A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About