Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain

Binaya, K C; Kajal, Thapa; Ranjeeta, Acharya; Govinda, Nepal

doi:10.1186/s41687-021-00343-9

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are 11 questions in the questionnaire, and the resulting score ranges from 0% to 100%; the higher the score, the more severe the disability. [27] 2.4.3. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).…”

Section: Oswestry Disability Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Feng spinal mobilization with Maitland mobilization in management of chronic nonspecific low back pain: A cohort study

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feng spinal mobilization (FSM) is one of the most widely practiced techniques in traditional Chinese osteopathy, especially in China. However, whether this FSM technique is more effective than the Maitland posteroanterior mobilization (MM), which is widely used all over the world, is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze and compare the efficacy of these 2 treatments in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) as to provide a basis for the clinical treatment of chronic low back pain. A total of 83 patients, including 43 patients in the FSM group and 40 in the MM group, were enrolled in this cohort study. FSM or MM was performed on patients 3 times during a period of 2 weeks. Changes in the subjective and objective measurements were measured before and after the third treatment. The subjective symptoms recorded included the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The objective symptoms, including the lumbar range of motion (ROM), and straight leg raise (SLR) height were also checked for any changes. The VAS scores were reassessed at the 1-year follow-up visit. The results showed that 2 weeks of FSM treatment significantly improved CNLBP patients modified Schober test (P < .05), extension ROM (P < .01), and SLR height (P < .05) while MM treatment did not. Both treatments significantly decreased the values of VAS, Oswestry disability index, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (P < .01). Compared to the MM treatment, the FSM treatment showed a much more significant improvement in VAS score (P < .01), range of motion of extension (P < .01), and SLR of both sides (P < .05). At the 1-year follow-up, VAS scores in both groups decreased significantly compared to pretreatments; however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Our data suggested that the FSM treatment can provide better efficacy than MM in CNLBP patients, improving the VAS scores, lumbar extension ROM, and SLR height in a shorter time. Abbreviations: CNLBP = chronic nonspecific low back pain, FSM = Feng spinal mobilization, LDH = lumbar disc herniation, MM = Maitland posteroanterior mobilization, mSchober test = modified Schober test, ODI = Oswestry disability index, PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire-9, ROM = lumbar range of motion, SLR = straight leg raise, VAS = visual analogue pain scale.

show abstract

Section: Oswestry Disability Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Feng spinal mobilization with Maitland mobilization in management of chronic nonspecific low back pain: A cohort study

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ODI has been translated or adapted for use in patients of different nationalities, in addition to the original English version, there are the following versions: Russian [25], Spanish [28], Arabic [29], Nepalese [30], Indonesian [31], Hausa version in African languages ( distributed in the territories of Niger and the northern half of Nigeria, as well as with significant minorities in Chad, Ghana and Cameroon) [32] and Yoruba (Nigeria, Togo, Benin, Ghana) [33], in Gujarati and Punjabi languages (one of the 23 official languages of India) [34,35], in Urdu (one of the two official languages of Pakistan) [36], etc.…”

Section: Scales For Assessing the Quality Of Life In Patients With Ba...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1

Trefilova¹,

Shnayder

Novitsky³

et al. 2022

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.

show abstract

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nepal: A mixed-methods study

Pathak,

Abbott,

Bajracharya

et al. 2023

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain

Cited by 4 publications

References 34 publications

Comparison of Feng spinal mobilization with Maitland mobilization in management of chronic nonspecific low back pain: A cohort study

Comparison of Feng spinal mobilization with Maitland mobilization in management of chronic nonspecific low back pain: A cohort study

Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nepal: A mixed-methods study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About