2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517510112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness of G protein-coupled odorant receptors is partially attributed to the activation mechanism

Abstract: Mammals detect and discriminate numerous odors via a large family of G protein-coupled odorant receptors (ORs). However, little is known about the molecular and structural basis underlying OR response properties. Using site-directed mutagenesis and computational modeling, we studied ORs sharing high sequence homology but with different response properties. When tested in heterologous cells by diverse odorants, MOR256-3 responded broadly to many odorants, whereas MOR256-8 responded weakly to a few odorants. Out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
59
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, receptors vary in their copy numbers [58], which implies different average sensitivities, see section E of the S1 Appendix. Additionally, point mutations of a receptor gene can change this receptor’s sensitivities to almost all ligands [59]. Consequently, typical receptor arrays might be heterogeneous, where some receptor types have larger mean sensitivities than others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, receptors vary in their copy numbers [58], which implies different average sensitivities, see section E of the S1 Appendix. Additionally, point mutations of a receptor gene can change this receptor’s sensitivities to almost all ligands [59]. Consequently, typical receptor arrays might be heterogeneous, where some receptor types have larger mean sensitivities than others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the sensitivities are tightly controlled and maybe even adjusted to the odor statistics of the environment. On evolutionary time scales, the sensitivities could be regulated by point mutations of the receptors that change how ligands bind [59]. On shorter time scales, the sensitivities could be regulated by changing the receptor copy numbers, see section E of the S1 Appendix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunocytochemisty-To determine the cellular expression levels of mouse Tas2r and their cell surface localization, selected receptor coding sequences (excluding the stop codon) were cloned in pcDNA5/FRT expression vector resulting in Tas2r sequences flanked by the first 60 amino acids of rhodopsin (Rho tag) (117), which can be detected with suitable antisera in vivo (118), and an HSV-tagged epitope at the amino and carboxyl termini, respectively. HEK293T-G␣16gust44 cells were grown and transfected with Rho-tagged receptor plasmids on poly-D-lysine-coated glass coverslips as published previously (1,30,31).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) is the most commonly used method for high-throughput screening of odorant receptor pairs [14, 56, 75, 86, 113]. This method quantifies cellular responses as an indirect measure of odorant receptor activation as previously described [117].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%