2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis

Abstract: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments can provide valid, interpretable measures of health status among adults with osteoarthritis (OA). However, their ability to detect meaningful change over time is unknown. We evaluated the responsiveness and minimally important differences (MID) for four PROMIS Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety. We analyzed adults with symptomatic knee OA from our randomized trial comparing Tai Chi and physical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
150
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
6
150
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The group who received resilience programming had average depression scores approximately three T scores lower than the comparison group. This difference is similar to the minimally important differences (2.2–4.5) identified for this measure (Lee et al, ; Pilkonis et al, ; Yost, Eton, Garcia, & Cella, ), supporting the clinical relevance of effects. This was despite the current program being brief in duration, delivered in the classroom setting, and targeting first‐year students regardless of baseline symptom severity (limiting potential for change in symptom scores; Hunt & Eisenberg, ; Ibrahim et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The group who received resilience programming had average depression scores approximately three T scores lower than the comparison group. This difference is similar to the minimally important differences (2.2–4.5) identified for this measure (Lee et al, ; Pilkonis et al, ; Yost, Eton, Garcia, & Cella, ), supporting the clinical relevance of effects. This was despite the current program being brief in duration, delivered in the classroom setting, and targeting first‐year students regardless of baseline symptom severity (limiting potential for change in symptom scores; Hunt & Eisenberg, ; Ibrahim et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Sex-specific population means for satisfaction are 51 ± 9 and 49 ± 11 for males and females, respectively. We considered a difference in score of 2–4 as a clinically meaningful difference similar to other PROMIS measures [2628]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that differences of 2.3 to 3.4 points in these PROMIS measures are clinically meaningful. 22 FACT-G EWB scores were similarly low; mean scores were a full SD lower than reference values for all adult patients with cancer and the general US adult population. 20 In addition, parenting-related (including parents' concerns and decisions regarding communication with their children) and clinical factors contributed nearly equal amounts of variance to FACT-G scores.…”
Section: Qol In Mothers With Metastatic Cancer/park Et Almentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Participants had a high psychological symptom burden, with mean PROMIS depression and anxiety symptom burden scores that were 6 points greater than those of US adults. It is interesting to note that differences of 2.3 to 3.4 points in these PROMIS measures are clinically meaningful . FACT‐G EWB scores were similarly low; mean scores were a full SD lower than reference values for all adult patients with cancer and the general US adult population .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%