2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsive Nanocarriers as an Emerging Platform for Cascaded Delivery of Nucleic Acids to Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
0
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, specific tumor stimuli-responsive DDSs, which respond to the characteristic biological stimuli that distinguish tumors from normal tissues, have been widely investigated to facilitate the precise delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors 7,8 . Compared with normal cells, most tumor cells exhibit a redox-heterogeneous intracellular microenvironment due to the simultaneous overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and glutathione (GSH) 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, specific tumor stimuli-responsive DDSs, which respond to the characteristic biological stimuli that distinguish tumors from normal tissues, have been widely investigated to facilitate the precise delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors 7,8 . Compared with normal cells, most tumor cells exhibit a redox-heterogeneous intracellular microenvironment due to the simultaneous overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and glutathione (GSH) 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, PEI can become protonated in the acid environment of lysosomes, resulting in disassembly of PEI-Ap-EPI nanoparticles and promotion of DNA-duplex escape from lysosomes (23), which, ultimately, helps to enhance therapy efficacy. Fourth, the DNA duplex can have a negative charge, thereby impeding its internalization by cancer cells (24). Following interaction with PEI, the charge of the obtained nanoparticles changed to positive, which was conducive to cell internalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 The current challenge is to prompt efficient endosomal escape and improve the degradation of nanoparticles in the cytoplasm of cancer cells. 18,19 On the other hand, in view of the pH variation in tumor tissues (pH 6.5-6.9), endo/lysosomes (pH 5.0-5.5) and normal physiological environment (pH 7.4), [20][21][22] pHinduced charge-reversible nanoparticles have been extensively reported to spontaneously improve cellular uptake and controllable drug release through the enhanced permeability and retention effects. 23,24 The negative charge renders nanoparticles with stealth characteristics to avoid non-specific protein binding and prolong retention time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%