Research Handbook on International Environmental Law 2010
DOI: 10.4337/9781849807265.00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsibility for Environmental Damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although "government consequence of individuals the people, by the people, and for the people" is the most frequently used definition of democracy. According to Okowa (Okowa 2015), democracy can be nurtured and sustained on the principles of popular sovereignty, majority rule, and the understanding that winning elections does not guarantee democracy. People define democracy as a political system in which people have access to a range of fundamental civil and political rights, and their most influential political figures are chosen in free and fair elections and held to account by the rule of law (Dalton et al 2007).…”
Section: The Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although "government consequence of individuals the people, by the people, and for the people" is the most frequently used definition of democracy. According to Okowa (Okowa 2015), democracy can be nurtured and sustained on the principles of popular sovereignty, majority rule, and the understanding that winning elections does not guarantee democracy. People define democracy as a political system in which people have access to a range of fundamental civil and political rights, and their most influential political figures are chosen in free and fair elections and held to account by the rule of law (Dalton et al 2007).…”
Section: The Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have underestimated the application of the principle of non-harm in situations where harm is caused not directly by a single source. 69 Therefore, with regard to climate change, it is not easy to detect a violation of the customary obligation to prohibit cross-border damage because this obligation is not well established in the customary international law, and its limits are not clear. 70…”
Section: Evaluating the Viability In Determining The Breach Of Obligationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of 'natural disasters' or 'emergencies' triggers the duty to notify under Principle 18. 66 Notably, the Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Natural Disasters 67 adopted by the ILC in 2016 define the term 'disaster' as 'a calamitous event' resulting in 'widespread loss of life, great human suffering and distress … or large-scale material or environmental damage, thereby seriously disrupting the functioning of society', 68 whereas the word 'emergencies' is interpreted to mean the circumstances 'that cause, or pose an imminent threat of causing, serious harm'. 69 Nowadays, Principle 18 is even extended to man-made disasters, 70 and it apparently entails a higher gravity threshold.…”
Section: Post-disaster Notificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 Nowadays, Principle 18 is even extended to man-made disasters, 70 and it apparently entails a higher gravity threshold. 71 Having said that, it is suggested that so long as the activity in question is intrinsically hazardous or if it is located in close proximity to an area of significant ecological importance, there exists a presumption of gravity. 72 If this view is accepted, outer space activities which are in general considered par excellence ultrahazardous 73 should be presumed to present an element of gravity and thus warrant notification.…”
Section: Post-disaster Notificationmentioning
confidence: 99%