Responsibility disengagement or sharing? Cooperative fulfilling mechanism of solid waste management in the remanufacturing supply chain

Tian, Gang; Zhang, Yaru; Tian, Ruoxi; Gong, Yu; Sun, Huaping; Li, Liang; Geng, Shaoqing

doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22497-9

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is assumed that the DfR cost () Fe is quadratic and satisfies ( ) 0 dF e de  , 22 ( ) 0 d F e de  and (0) 0 F = . Specifically, the DfR cost is 2 ( ) 2 F e e = , which is widely used in the literature (Shen et al 2021;Tian et al 2023;Xu et al 2023). While choosing to share the cost, the remanufacturer will undertake k proportion of DfR cost, i.e., 2 2 ke .…”

Section: Model Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design for Remanufacturing: Manufacturer’s Motivation and Remanufacturer’s Responsibility Sharing

Lu,

Chang,

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research focuses on two critical facets: the motivation driving manufacturers to engage in Design for Remanufacturing (DfR) and the decision-making process of the authorized remanufacturer regarding shared DfR responsibility. The study describes a scenario where the manufacturer produces new products and the authorised remanufacturer produces remanufactured products. The research employs three distinct models to analyse the complex dynamics between these two stakeholders. The findings indicate that: 1) the manufacturer's motivation for undertaking DfR responsibility is to optimise remanufacturing revenues by strategically increasing authorisation fees. 2) In scenarios where the unit remanufacturing cost-saving is limited, the authorized remanufacturer shares the DfR responsibility and selectively remanufactures a portion of used products. 3) Shared responsibility increases the remanufacturing ratio and profits for both stakeholders, effectively mitigating the free-rider dilemma. In addition, shared responsibility increases the authorisation fee without changing the proportion of DfR performance captured by the manufacturer.

show abstract

Section: Model Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design for Remanufacturing: Manufacturer’s Motivation and Remanufacturer’s Responsibility Sharing

Lu,

Chang,

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, investors would pressure the firm not to go against environmental regulations to avoid losing a significant profit to penalties and tax payments [1,5]. As more regulations and enforcement create environmental awareness among society, consumers, competitors, and suppliers tend to adopt better environmental behavior to support the government's environmental goal [49,50]. The government is enforcing environmental regulations in line with the carbon turning point and carbon neutrality proposed by the Chinese government, hence focusing on stakeholder pressure perceived by the firm under the influence of environmental regulations.…”

Section: Stakeholder Pressures' Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Environmental Regulation on Energy-Intensive Enterprises’ Green Innovation Performance

Wang

Tan

et al. 2023

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promoting energy-intensive enterprises’ green innovation is essential for transitioning to a low-carbon economy. This study explores the promoting factors and influencing mechanisms that drive energy-intensive enterprises’ green innovation performance from the perspective of environmental regulation and the theory of planned behavior. A questionnaire was distributed to energy-intensive enterprises in China from February 2021 to March 2022, and various statistical analyses such as confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity analysis, structural equation modeling, and stepwise regression model analysis were conducted. The findings reveal that environmental regulation has a positive impact on energy-intensive enterprises’ environmental innovation prospective, stakeholder pressure, and innovation capability, respectively. In turn, this has a significant impact on enterprises’ green innovation performance. This study also found stakeholder pressure and green innovation capability to play an important role between environmental regulation and green innovation performance. It is better to promote enterprises’ green innovation prospective and innovation ability through environmental regulation to promote stakeholder pressure, in turn, that improve enterprises’ innovation performance. It is important to leverage these influencing factors to promote green innovation performance to achieve a carbon turning point.

show abstract

Responsibility disengagement or sharing? Cooperative fulfilling mechanism of solid waste management in the remanufacturing supply chain

Cited by 2 publications

References 55 publications

Design for Remanufacturing: Manufacturer’s Motivation and Remanufacturer’s Responsibility Sharing

Design for Remanufacturing: Manufacturer’s Motivation and Remanufacturer’s Responsibility Sharing

Effect of Environmental Regulation on Energy-Intensive Enterprises’ Green Innovation Performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About