2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses to species-specific vocalizations in the auditory cortex of awake and anesthetized guinea pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ketamine, which was used to anesthetize the animals in our experiments, has been shown to alter the spontaneous firing rate and stimulus-driven activity (rate and temporal pattern) in the auditory cortex (Syka et al 2005;Zurita et al 1994). Changes in frequency coding properties have also been observed under anesthesia Ostwald 2001, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Ketamine, which was used to anesthetize the animals in our experiments, has been shown to alter the spontaneous firing rate and stimulus-driven activity (rate and temporal pattern) in the auditory cortex (Syka et al 2005;Zurita et al 1994). Changes in frequency coding properties have also been observed under anesthesia Ostwald 2001, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The AC is very susceptible to anesthesia. Response properties of A1 neurons in rodent are changed profoundly by application of Equithesin, urethane, or ketamine (Gaese and Ostwald, 2001;Cotillon-Williams and Edeline, 2003;Syka et al, 2005). Different anesthetics can exert a variety of effects on auditory cortical neurons resulting in, for example, threshold changes (Cheung et al, 2001), altered spontaneous rate (Zurita et al, 1994), or evoked oscillations (Cotillon-Williams and Edeline, 2003).…”
Section: Role Of Cortical Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to claim that auditory coding is the same at the level of the midbrain as in the cochlea. However, there is evidence from animal studies suggesting that some general coding features of complex sound (e.g., to varying pitch or animal vocalizations) are maintained, to some extent, from the cochlea up to the auditory cortex (Cariani & Delgutte, 1996;Suta, Kvasnak, Popelar, & Syka, 2003;Syka, Suta, & Popelar, 2005;Wang, Merzenich, Beitel, & Schreiner, 1995). In particular, many neurons still respond in synchrony to the envelope of the sound signal and with a spatial representation for frequency information at the level of the midbrain as occur within the cochlea (Joris, Schreiner, & Rees, 2004;Krishna & Semple, 2000).…”
Section: Patient Fitting and Psychophysical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%