2012
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses to ethanol in C57BL/6 versus C57BL/6 × 129 hybrid mice

Abstract: Although genetic background alters responses to ethanol, there has not yet been a methodical quantification of differences in ethanol-related behaviors between inbred and hybrid mice commonly used in gene-targeting studies. Here, we compared C57BL/6NTac × 129S6/SvEvTac F1 hybrid mice (B6129S6) with C57BL/6NTac inbred mice (B6NT), and C57BL/6J × 129X1/SvJ (B6129X1) and C57BL/6J × 129S4/SvJae F1 hybrids (B6129S4) with C57BL/6J mice (B6J), in five commonly used tests: continuous access two-bottle choice drinking,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic background also influences the total amount of ethanol consumed in different procedures. Hybrid C57BL/6 X 129S6_SvEvTac mice consume significantly less ethanol compared with C57BL/6 mice in the 24-hour continuous access procedure and the 4-hour limited access procedure (Lim et al, 2012). The level of consumption in our hybrid C57BL/6 X 129S6_SvEvTac wild-type mice was less than that seen with C57BL/6J mice in the 24-hour intermittent ethanol procedure (Hwa et al, 2011; Crabbe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic background also influences the total amount of ethanol consumed in different procedures. Hybrid C57BL/6 X 129S6_SvEvTac mice consume significantly less ethanol compared with C57BL/6 mice in the 24-hour continuous access procedure and the 4-hour limited access procedure (Lim et al, 2012). The level of consumption in our hybrid C57BL/6 X 129S6_SvEvTac wild-type mice was less than that seen with C57BL/6J mice in the 24-hour intermittent ethanol procedure (Hwa et al, 2011; Crabbe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethanol place preference was established by conditioning C57BL/6 mice (male, 18–22g, Taconic) to 2 g/kg (15%) ethanol (Lim et al, 2011). A locomotor box (Med Associates, St Albans, VT) was divided in two chambers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the most prominent animal models in EtOH research are intermittent access to EtOH (IAE) using 2‐bottle choice (Barak et al., ,b; Carnicella et al., , ; George et al., ; Hopf et al., ; Lee et al., ; Li et al., ; Lim et al., ; Millan et al., ; Momeni et al., ; Seif et al., ; Simms et al., , ; Wise, ) and chronic intermittent EtOH (CIE) vapor exposure (Gilpin et al., ,c; de Guglielmo et al., ; Kissler et al., ; Leao et al., ; Staples et al., ). The IAE paradigm is commonly used to model bingelike drinking and compulsive‐like responding for EtOH (Barak et al., ; Feduccia et al., ; Nielsen et al., ; Simms et al., ) before dependence occurs, whereas CIE has been used to model postdependent states, as well as excessive drinking and compulsive‐like responding for EtOH when combined with EtOH self‐administration (O'Dell et al., ; Roberts et al., , ; Rogers et al., ; Schulteis et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%