Responses of Various Market Classes of Dry Beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>L.) to Linuron

Soltani, Nader; Shropshire, Christy; Sikkema, Peter H.

doi:10.1614/wt-04-070r1.1

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is consistent with other studies that have shown similar responses with soil applications of S-metolachlor, imazethapyr, flumioxazin, and linuron Soltani et al 2003Soltani et al , 2004Soltani et al , 2005Soltani et al , 2006.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…White (navy) beans were found to be more sensitive to EPTC than pinto and light red kidney beans and black and white beans were more sensitive to alachlor than Great Northern, pinto, cranberry, and pink beans (Urwin et al 1996). Large-seeded market classes of dry beans were more tolerant to linuron than small-seeded market classes (Soltani et al 2006). White beans are more sensitive to alachlor than red kidney beans (Doersch et al 1974).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dry Bean Response to Preemergence-Applied KIH-485

2007

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three field trials were conducted over a 2-yr period (2004 and 2005) at Exeter and Ridgetown, Ontario to evaluate the tolerance of eight market classes of dry beans to KIH-485 applied PRE at 210 and 420 g ai/ha. KIH-485 PRE caused as much as 67% visual injury in small-seeded and 44% visual injury in large-seeded dry beans. KIH-485 applied PRE at 420 g/ha reduced plant height up to 47% at Ridgetown and 8% at Exeter in 2004, and reduced height of brown and white bean by 15 and 19%, respectively, but had no effect on the height of the other beans in 2005. Shoot dry weight was not affected at Exeter in 2004 but was reduced by 46% at Ridgetown in 2004 and 14% at Exeter in 2005. In 2004, seed moisture content increased by 5, 6, and 12% in black, otebo, and pinto beans, respectively. Seed yield was reduced up to 27% at Ridgetown and 11% at Exeter in 2004 but was not affected at Exeter in 2005. On the basis of this research, KIH-485 PRE causes unacceptable injury in some dry bean market classes.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dry Bean Response to Preemergence-Applied KIH-485

2007

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cloransulammethyl (35 g ai.ha -1 ), linuron (2250 g ai.ha ) provided up to 8%, 44%, 21%, 18%, and 2% control 4 WAE ( Table 2) and up to 6%, 24%, 14%, 8%, and 0% control 8 WAE, respectively ( Table 3). This is consistent with research in Phaseolus vulgaris, where Soltani et al [12] found linuron injured black bean (27%) and white bean (31%) at 4 WAE. In addition, a study evaluating flumetsulam use in southern pea (Vigna unguiculata L.) reported that there was crop injury of 13% at 3 WAA, demonstrating southern pea's relative tolerance to flumetsulam [13].…”

Section: Pre-emergence Herbicidessupporting

confidence: 92%

Control of volunteer adzuki bean in soybean

Kramer¹,

Soltani²,

Robinson³

et al. 2012

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT, and imazethapyr applied PRE provided up to 6%, 24%, 14%, 8%, and 0% control, respectively at 8 weeks after emergence (WAE), while acifluorfen, fomesafen, bentazon, thifensulfuron-methyl, cloransulam-methyl, imazethapyr, and imazethapyr plus bentazon applied POST provided 2%, 2%, 5%, 34%, 6%, 4%, and 12% control, respectively at 8 weeks after application (WAA). Generally, with the aforementioned herbicides, soybean yield was equivalent to the weedy control and soybean grain contamination with adzuki bean seed was consistently above the 1% maximum threshold. Chlorimuron-ethyl and glyphosate applied POST provided up to 84% and 94% visual control at 8 WAA, respectively, decreased adzuki bean density, biomass, and seed production, and generally decreased soybean contamination with adzuki bean below the 1% threshold. The only herbicides evaluated in this study that controlled volunteer adzuki bean in soybean were chlorimuron-ethyl (9 g ai.ha

show abstract

“…Soltani and Sikkema (2005) reported that cloransulam‐methyl applied PPI to white bean resulted in ≤10% crop injury, which is considered to be commercially acceptable, but it reduced the plant height, biomass, and yield in comparison to an untreated control. Soltani et al. (2008b) found that halosulfuron‐methyl applied PPI at 35 and 70 g ai ha −1 caused minimal crop injury and did not reduce the plant height or yield of several market classes of dry bean.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, several studies have reported that halosulfuron‐methyl has an adequate margin of crop safety for several market classes of bean (Silvey et al. 2006; Soltani et al. 2008b).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Tolerance of adzuki bean to preplant‐incorporated, pre‐emergence, and post‐emergence herbicides in Ontario, Canada

Stewart

Nurse

Gillard

et al. 2010

Weed Biology and Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Weed management options for adzuki-bean growers in Ontario, Canada are limited due to few herbicide registrations. Four field trials were conducted at three locations in south-western Ontario in 2007 and 2008 to determine the tolerance of adzuki bean to several preplantincorporated (PPI), pre-emergence (PRE), and post-emergence (POST) herbicides. All the herbicides were applied at the doses registered for use in soybean. The application of pendimethalin, cloransulam-methyl, and halosulfuron-methyl (PPI), flumetsulam, cloransulammethyl, and halosulfuron-methyl (PRE), and acifluorfen and fomesafen (POST) caused Յ15% crop injury; however, the injury was transient and did not reduce the adzuki bean yield. The POST application of cloransulam-methyl and imazethapyr caused Յ23% crop injury and reduced the biomass by Յ50%, but did not reduce the plant height or crop yield. Metribuzin, flumetsulam, atrazine, and pyroxasulfone (PPI), metribuzin, linuron, pyroxasulfone, and atrazine (PRE), and bentazon, imazethapyr plus bentazon, halosulfuron-methyl, and thifensulfuronmethyl (POST) caused Յ61% crop injury.These treatments reduced the biomass, plant height, and crop yield. Based on these results, pendimethalin, cloransulam-methyl, and halosulfuronmethyl applied PPI, flumetsulam, cloransulam-methyl, and halosulfuron-methyl applied PRE, and acifluorfen and fomesafen applied POST might be potential weed management options for weed management in adzuki bean. Cloransulam-methyl and imazethapyr applied POST will need further evaluation due to phytotoxicity concerns. Metribuzin, flumetsulam, atrazine, and pyroxasulfone applied PPI, metribuzin, linuron, atrazine, and pyroxasulfone applied PRE, and bentazon, imazethapyr plus bentazon, halosulfuron-methyl, and thifensulfuron-methyl applied POST did not have an adequate margin of safety.

show abstract

Responses of Various Market Classes of Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) to Linuron

Cited by 9 publications

References 14 publications

Dry Bean Response to Preemergence-Applied KIH-485

Dry Bean Response to Preemergence-Applied KIH-485

Control of volunteer adzuki bean in soybean

Tolerance of adzuki bean to preplant‐incorporated, pre‐emergence, and post‐emergence herbicides in Ontario, Canada

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About