2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep08587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Solid Tumor Cells in DMEM to Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Non-Thermal Plasma and Chemically Induced ROS Systems

Abstract: In this study, we assessed the role of different reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by soft jet plasma and chemical-induced ROS systems with regard to cell death in T98G, A549, HEK293 and MRC5 cell lines. For a comparison with plasma, we generated superoxide anion (O2−), hydroxyl radical (HO·), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with chemicals inside an in vitro cell culture. Our data revealed that plasma decreased the viability and intracellular ATP values of cells and increased the apoptotic population via a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we hypothesized that plasma-generated ROS enhance PEF-induced membrane electroporation and cytotoxicity [27,33]. Our second hypothesis was that the combination of plasma and PEF augments ROS production cell death signaling [29,34,35]. While three previous studies investigated the combination of plasma-treated liquids and PEF on cancer cells [36][37][38], our study aimed at elucidating the underlying mechanism of direct plasma treatment and pulsed electric fields (PEFs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we hypothesized that plasma-generated ROS enhance PEF-induced membrane electroporation and cytotoxicity [27,33]. Our second hypothesis was that the combination of plasma and PEF augments ROS production cell death signaling [29,34,35]. While three previous studies investigated the combination of plasma-treated liquids and PEF on cancer cells [36][37][38], our study aimed at elucidating the underlying mechanism of direct plasma treatment and pulsed electric fields (PEFs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marker was originally associated with DNA damage and DSBs [Whitaker et al, 1991]. An increase of gH2AX in plasma-treated cells was identified in vitro in primary tumor-derived melanoma cells [Sensenig et al, 2011], metastatic melanoma cells [Arndt et al, 2013b], squamous cell carcinoma [Chang et al, 2014], colon cancer cells [Judee et al, 2016], breast epithelial cells , glioblastoma [Kaushik et al, 2015], immortalized fibroblasts [Kim et al, 2011b], and colorectal carcinoma cells [Plewa et al, 2014]. Despite the importance of in vitro experiments, preclinical studies have failed to show an increase of gH2AX in ex vivo plasma-treated human skin [Isbary Fig.…”
Section: Image Flow Cytometry Mn Assay Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of ROS, which are derived from NADPH oxidase, mitochondrial oxidase, and xanthine oxidase (XO), is postulated to be important in tumor biology (e.g., in both ROS-induced damage of DNA and proteins and the activation of the ERK1/2/MAPK pathway) (4). Modification of gene expression by ROS has direct effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis via the activation of transcription factors, including activator protein 1, and via the NF-kB pathways (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%