2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00785-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of small mammals to land restoration after mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike other studies, we found no significant relationship between disturbance intensity and species abundance or richness, most likely because disturbance intensity was rather similar across sites, differing only in the number of pits and logged trees (Carreño-Rocabado et al 2012;Burivalova et al 2014). Older sites may show faster signs of passive recovery in terms of both flora and fauna than newly disturbed sites of the same size (Meli et al 2017;Lawer et al 2019). The disturbance history of our sites is unknown and cannot be reconstructed due to the activities being illegal, but we assume that our replicated sampling design could randomly capture a variety of different disturbance histories and therefore seems unlikely to bias our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Unlike other studies, we found no significant relationship between disturbance intensity and species abundance or richness, most likely because disturbance intensity was rather similar across sites, differing only in the number of pits and logged trees (Carreño-Rocabado et al 2012;Burivalova et al 2014). Older sites may show faster signs of passive recovery in terms of both flora and fauna than newly disturbed sites of the same size (Meli et al 2017;Lawer et al 2019). The disturbance history of our sites is unknown and cannot be reconstructed due to the activities being illegal, but we assume that our replicated sampling design could randomly capture a variety of different disturbance histories and therefore seems unlikely to bias our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Small mammals and rodents are the most common groups of this taxonomic group in Iberia, and they usually prefer temperate, moist and rainy habitats since their basic diet components (insects and herbaceous plants) proliferate throughout the year in these areas (Vickery and Rivest, 1992;Milstead et al, 2007;Hsu et al, 2012); therefore, PAs with very warm and arid climates could be harboring species with similar traits or lineages which are adapted to survive under these climatic conditions. Conversely, PAs with larger areas covered with inland wetlands and mine, dump and construction sites showed a tendency toward an underrepresentation of phylogenetic diversity, which is not unexpected because these habitats are extremely hostile for most terrestrial mammals where only a reduced number of species can survive (Ardente et al, 2016;Lawer et al, 2019). We found higher functional diversity of mammals than expected from the regional pool in PAs with larger areas covered by arable lands, which could be due to the presence of generalist species that are known to thrive in agricultural landscapes (Dotta and Verdade, 2011;Magioli et al, 2016).…”
Section: Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chamblin (2002) compared mammal species richness among four treatments (intact forest-premining; grassland-7-21 years post reclamation; shrub/pole-18-28 years; fragmented forest-streamside buffer surrounded by reclaimed lands) and reported no differences in species richness among treatments and no correlation between time since reclamation and species richness on mountaintop-removal mines in southern West Virginia. Use of reclaimed mine sites by fossorial (ground-dwelling) and semifossorial mammals depends on depth of soil and degree of substrate compaction (Lawer et al 2019). Species requiring exposed rock outcrops such as the Allegheny woodrat (Neotoma magister) may decline or be absent from post-SMCRA minelands unless an artificial structure can serve as an alternative to native habitat (Chamblin et al 2004).…”
Section: Small and Meso-mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%