Responses of Rhizospheric Microbial Communities of Native and Alien Plant Species to Cuscuta Parasitism

Abstract

Parasitic plants have major impacts on host fitness. In the case of species of the holoparasitic Cuscuta genus, these impacts were shown to be particularly strong in some invasive alien plants, which has raised interest in the underlying mechanism. We hypothesized that Cuscuta parasitization may exert strong influence in shaping the diversity patterns in the host rhizosphere microbiome and that this may vary between native (coevolved) and alien (non-coevolved) plants. Here, we report on a field study exploring the effect of parasitization by Cuscuta australis on the rhizosphere microbiota (16S and ITS rDNA) of four plant species sharing and three plant species not sharing the parasite's native range. Despite a predominant role of the host species in shaping the rhizosphere microbiota, the role of host origin and of parasitization still appeared important in structuring microbial communities and their associated functions. Bacterial communities were more strongly influenced than fungi by the native range of the host plant, while fungi were slightly more affected than bacteria by parasitization. About 7% of bacterial phylotypes and 11% of fungal phylotypes were sensitive to Cuscuta parasitization. Parasitization also reduced the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by ca. 18% and of several genes related to plant growth promoting functions (e.g., nitrogen metabolism and quorum sensing). Both fungi and bacteria differentially responded to host parasitization depending on host origin, and the extent of these shifts suggests that they may have more dramatic consequences for alien than for native plants.

Evidence for Elton's diversity–invasibility hypothesis from belowground

“…We processed the raw sequences with the DADA2 pipeline (Callahan et al 2016), which is designed to resolve exact biological sequences (Amplicon Sequence Variants [ASVs]) from Illumina sequence data and does not involve sequence clustering (Callahan et al 2017). The detailed process was described in Brunel et al (2019). In short, we removed primers and adapter with the cutadapt package (Martin 2011), merged paired‐end sequences, and removed chimeras.…”

Biological invasions alter environmental microbiomes: A meta-analysis

“…Previous studies have shown biological invasions can impact the diversity and taxonomical structure of environmental microbiomes. For example, we often see a shift in soil microbiota following invasion by non-native plant species [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Removal of feral pigs increased the diversity of soil bacterial communities and shifted their structure [20], and invasive crustaceans [21], mussels [22] and jellyfish [23] produce changes in the structure of water microbiomes.…”

Soil Microbial Differences under Unpalatable Stellera Chamaejasme and Neighboring Palatable Elymus Nutans in Alpine Meadows

“…The differences in soil properties (Table 2 and Fig. 2), litter decomposition (Hobbie, 2015), together with different quantity and quality of root exudations (Sun et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2019;Brunel et al, 2019) are likely the reasons for the different soil microbial community found in Stellera patches. The alpha diversity indices and the rarefaction analysis (Fig.…”