2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-20971-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication

Abstract: Inadvertent cues can be refined into signals through coevolution between signalers and receivers, yet the earliest steps in this process remain elusive. In Hawaiian populations of the Pacific field cricket, a new morph producing a novel and incredibly variable song (purring) has spread across islands. Here we characterize the current sexual and natural selection landscape acting on the novel signal by (1) determining fitness advantages of purring through attraction to mates and protection from a prominent dead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Hawaiian Islands, the typical airborne acoustic calling song also attracts an acoustically orienting predator, the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea (Bigot, 1889). O. ochracea facilitated the evolution of an obligately silent male morph of T. oceanicus Kolluru 1998, Zuk et al 2006) and is likely playing a role in the evolution of a newly discovered male morph, purring crickets (Tinghitella et al 2018, Tinghitella et al 2021. Purring crickets are a new acoustic morph in Hawaii in which males use wing stridulation to produce airborne acoustic signals that are lower in amplitude and more broadband than typical male songs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Hawaiian Islands, the typical airborne acoustic calling song also attracts an acoustically orienting predator, the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea (Bigot, 1889). O. ochracea facilitated the evolution of an obligately silent male morph of T. oceanicus Kolluru 1998, Zuk et al 2006) and is likely playing a role in the evolution of a newly discovered male morph, purring crickets (Tinghitella et al 2018, Tinghitella et al 2021. Purring crickets are a new acoustic morph in Hawaii in which males use wing stridulation to produce airborne acoustic signals that are lower in amplitude and more broadband than typical male songs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phonotaxis experiments have revealed that female crickets use the purring song to locate mates, and the role of the purr in courtship is still uncertain (Tinghitella et al 2018). Some female O. ochracea can also locate hosts using the purr, but they overwhelmingly prefer typical males in field choice tests (Tinghitella et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…songs to locate mates, but more females respond to the ancestral song than to the purring song (Tinghitella et al, 2018). Similarly, in the lab, flies are able to locate speakers broadcasting purring songs over short distances, but in preliminary trials we caught flies only when we broadcast ancestral song from fly traps in the field (Tinghitella et al, 2021). One of the big remaining questions is how female crickets and flies respond to different purrs in the wild, and answering it would help us understand how sexual selection (female crickets) and natural selection (female flies) are acting on the new purring sexual signal.…”
Section: Study System Experimental Design and Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoconocephalus males could also counter parasitism by reduced calling activity (Vélez & Brockmann, 2006;Zuk et al, 2006), increased grooming to remove planidia larva (Vincent & Bertram, 2010), increased caution (Lewkiewicz & Zuk, 2004), temporal shift of calling activity (Cade et al, 1996), change of the signal or signaling behavior (Belwood & Morris, 1987;Tinghitella et al, 2021;Zuk et al, 2006), or possibly calling in conspecific or heterospecific aggregations and thus benefitting by confusing the parasitoid and/ or reduce the parasitism risk through dilution (reviews in Lehmann & Lakes-Harlan, 2019;Goodale et al, 2019;but: Cade, 1981;Trillo et al, 2016). Especially changes in signaling behavior or signal features could introduce the variation necessary for the communication system of parasitized populations to evolve rapidly.…”
Section: Natural Selection and Possible Adaptations Of Host Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%