2010
DOI: 10.1152/jn.91323.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Human Medial Temporal Lobe Neurons Are Modulated by Stimulus Repetition

Abstract: Here we show how repeated stimulus presentation-photos of celebrities and familiar individuals, landmark buildings, animals, and objects-modulates the firing rate of these cells: a consistent decrease in the neural activity was registered as images were repeatedly shown during experimental sessions. The effect of repeated stimulus presentation was not the same for all medial temporal lobe areas. These findings are consistent with the view that medial temporal lobe neurons link visual percepts to declarative me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
10
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critically, this selectivity was not linked with the novelty of the event, per se, but to specific stimuli (Pedreira et al, 2010), thus intimating a primacy of intrinsic value (e.g., self-relevance) over novelty alone. While complementary functions such as novelty/familiarity detection, arousal processing and memory should not be discounted, this study suggests that specific amygdala neurons may scan the environment for relevance amongst novel stimuli (Pedreira et al, 2010). While contemporary neuroscience literature supports amygdala relevance processing (Pessoa & Adolphs, 2010;Sander et al, 2003), intracranial data evidence a direct relation between amygdala neuronal activity and relevance processing, both implicitly (Br azdil et al, 2002;Viskontas, Quiroga, & Fried, 2009) and explicitly (Jenison, Rangel, Oya, Kawasaki, & Howard, 2011).…”
Section: Relevancementioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Critically, this selectivity was not linked with the novelty of the event, per se, but to specific stimuli (Pedreira et al, 2010), thus intimating a primacy of intrinsic value (e.g., self-relevance) over novelty alone. While complementary functions such as novelty/familiarity detection, arousal processing and memory should not be discounted, this study suggests that specific amygdala neurons may scan the environment for relevance amongst novel stimuli (Pedreira et al, 2010). While contemporary neuroscience literature supports amygdala relevance processing (Pessoa & Adolphs, 2010;Sander et al, 2003), intracranial data evidence a direct relation between amygdala neuronal activity and relevance processing, both implicitly (Br azdil et al, 2002;Viskontas, Quiroga, & Fried, 2009) and explicitly (Jenison, Rangel, Oya, Kawasaki, & Howard, 2011).…”
Section: Relevancementioning
confidence: 85%
“…In further support of this claim, iEEG evidence suggests human amygdala neurons encode events in dissociated segments, organized individually according to category-based or object-based stimulus features (Gelbard-Sagiv et al, 2008;Kreiman et al, 2000a;Paz et al, 2010;Quiroga et al, 2007Quiroga et al, , 2005 and semantic/affective meaning (Naccache et al, 2005;Pedreira et al, 2010;Quian Quiroga et al, 2009). Several single-neuron studies illustrate the amygdala's capacity to selectively encode object categories (Gelbard-Sagiv et al, 2008; Kreiman et al, 2002Kreiman et al, , 2000aMormann et al, 2008;Pourtois, Spinelli, et al, 2010), individual objects (Kreiman et al, 2002;Quiroga et al, 2005, Quian Quiroga et al, 2009, and abstract concepts/images from words (Br azdil et al, 2002;Cameron et al, 2001;Halgren, Babb & Rausch, et al, 1977;Heit et al, 1988;Naccache et al, 2005).…”
Section: Memory Formation and Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations