2011
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00956.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells

Abstract: Cai C, Ren Q, Desai NJ, Rizzo JF 3rd, Fried SI. Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimulation rate has also been shown to influence the color of the percept with epiretinal stimulation (Stanga PE, et al IOVS 2011;52:ARVO E-Abstract 4949; Stanga PE, et al IOVS 2012;53:ARVO E-Abstract 6952). These results suggest that stimulation rate may have affected neuronal selectivity, as different types of RGCs in vitro have been shown to ''follow'' (i.e., produce at least one spike per pulse) at different maximum stimulus rates, [45][46][47][48] with some ON-OFF directionally sensitive RGCs able to follow up to 2000-pps stimuli. 49 Higher rates may have also predominantly stimulated RGCs with less activation of the remaining neural network, or, alternatively, central mechanisms due to integration of multiple stimuli in a short-term window 50 could have led to differences in appearance.…”
Section: Effect Of Stimulus Parameters On Phosphenesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Stimulation rate has also been shown to influence the color of the percept with epiretinal stimulation (Stanga PE, et al IOVS 2011;52:ARVO E-Abstract 4949; Stanga PE, et al IOVS 2012;53:ARVO E-Abstract 6952). These results suggest that stimulation rate may have affected neuronal selectivity, as different types of RGCs in vitro have been shown to ''follow'' (i.e., produce at least one spike per pulse) at different maximum stimulus rates, [45][46][47][48] with some ON-OFF directionally sensitive RGCs able to follow up to 2000-pps stimuli. 49 Higher rates may have also predominantly stimulated RGCs with less activation of the remaining neural network, or, alternatively, central mechanisms due to integration of multiple stimuli in a short-term window 50 could have led to differences in appearance.…”
Section: Effect Of Stimulus Parameters On Phosphenesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several in vitro studies using epiretinal and subretinal stimulation have shown that most types of RGCs are typically ''desensitized'' at high stimulation rates (beyond 200 pps), such that they may fail to ''follow'' each pulse within a high-rate pulse train or produce no spiking at all. [63][64][65] However, there are some types of RGCs that can follow even 600-pps stimulation, 66 and a recent study performing epiretinal stimulation showed robust responses in ON-OFF directionally sensitive RGCs when stimulation was applied at 2000 pps. 67 It is possible that higher rates may provide exclusive activation of RGCs as opposed to the remaining neural network, thus bringing down thresholds and eliciting clearer phosphenes.…”
Section: Stimulus Parameter Influence On Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They therefore resemble the visual input to RGCs during normal vision, wherein periods of fixation are interspersed by saccadic eye movements [11]. The responses evoked by the visual stimuli and, as a result, the temporal patterns of electrical stimulation were sporadic in nature, unlike the regular periodic stimuli more typically used [1]- [4]. Our experimental paradigm therefore more closely approximates the challenge faced by retinal prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Given that RGCs can fire at high rates (> 200 spikes per second) in response to normal visual stimulation, the ability to evoke high firing rates in RGCs in response to prosthetic stimulation is of direct consequence to the development of functional retinal prostheses. However, reports on the response of RGCs to repetitive stimulation, particularly at high frequencies, have been mixed [1]- [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%