2015
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01125-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to pulmonary rehabilitation: toward personalised programmes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stemming from our experience and from literature, we think that pulmonary rehabilitation treatment, which integrates an interdisciplinary approach, a pharmacological/nonpharmacological management and a tailored intervention, could optimize the therapeutic approach in COPD patients without neglecting their clinical, relational and psychosocial needs 4,8,9,38,45,47,48…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Stemming from our experience and from literature, we think that pulmonary rehabilitation treatment, which integrates an interdisciplinary approach, a pharmacological/nonpharmacological management and a tailored intervention, could optimize the therapeutic approach in COPD patients without neglecting their clinical, relational and psychosocial needs 4,8,9,38,45,47,48…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, given the multifaceted aspects of adherence and such a widespread presence of MCI or cognitive impairment in the COPD population, the rehabilitative project should be personalized and tailored to individual needs. It is clear that there are many factors to be considered and managed, thus an interdisciplinary approach should be always implemented to cope with this complex issue, in particular in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings, in order to favor a more and more individualized and personalized treatment (Ambrosino and Clini, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these are patients’ education, values and preferences, media pressures, third payer’s convenience, legal fears and last (but hopefully not least…) clinical decision and competence by clinicians. Clinicians should tailor21 the best care for their individual patient on the basis of their experience, and according to the present scientific evidence it is here that, taken together, the three recent papers16–18 may be helpful in at least closing one chapter in the treatment of COPD and releasing the efforts of the patients and their carers for therapies of proven benefit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%