2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to own name in children: ERP study of auditory social information processing

Abstract: Auditory processing is an important component of cognitive development, and names are among the most frequently occurring receptive language stimuli. Although own name processing has been examined in infants and adults, surprisingly little data exist on responses to own name in children. The present ERP study examined spoken name processing in 32 children (M=7.85 years) using a passive listening paradigm. Our results demonstrated that children differentiate own and close other’s names from unknown names, as re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(59 reference statements)
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Key et al . ; Peters et al . ) and confirmed by visual inspection of the grand‐averaged waveforms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…; Key et al . ; Peters et al . ) and confirmed by visual inspection of the grand‐averaged waveforms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we demonstrated that the established adult pattern of increased parietal responses to personally relevant compared with novel names is also present in typically developing children between the ages of 4 and 12 years (Key et al . ). In that study, auditory ERPs recorded during passive listening successfully differentiated own and close other's names (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Auditory ERPs during passive listening to a variety of spoken stimuli, from single syllables to complete words, have been previously used to document typical and atypical language functioning, make predictions regarding developmental outcomes, and to evaluate treatment effects in other neurodevelopmental disorders (Key et al, 2016; Maitre et al, 2013, 2014; Sandbank et al, 2017; Yoder et al, 2013). Recently, we successfully used auditory ERPs in response to known or familiarized through repetition stimuli compared to novel distracters to document learning and memory in nonverbal individuals with other neurogenetic disorders, such as MECP2 duplication and Rett syndromes (Peters et al, 2015, 2017, 2018), the latter sharing several phenotypic features with AS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%