1981
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1981.45.6.1043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: velocity sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By itself, however, invariance does not reveal the fundamental nature of the three-dimensional shape coding, and more detailed tests were necessary to assess the three-dimensional shape representation in AIP. Accordingly we have shown that AIP neurons provide detailed information about the degree of curvedness in the stimuli, not by virtue of a collection of neurons tuned to different values of this continuous quantity (Tudusciuc and Nieder, 2007), but rather through a mostly monotonic relationship between spike rate and curvedness (Orban et al, 1981). Conversely, many AIP neurons do not signal the presence of disparity discontinuities in reduced versions of the smoothly curved surfaces, at least in the initial part of their response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…By itself, however, invariance does not reveal the fundamental nature of the three-dimensional shape coding, and more detailed tests were necessary to assess the three-dimensional shape representation in AIP. Accordingly we have shown that AIP neurons provide detailed information about the degree of curvedness in the stimuli, not by virtue of a collection of neurons tuned to different values of this continuous quantity (Tudusciuc and Nieder, 2007), but rather through a mostly monotonic relationship between spike rate and curvedness (Orban et al, 1981). Conversely, many AIP neurons do not signal the presence of disparity discontinuities in reduced versions of the smoothly curved surfaces, at least in the initial part of their response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For moving bars, the response metric was the average firing rate over a time window equal to the duration of the sweep of the bar through the receptive field. The duration of this window varied inversely, therefore, with the speed of the bar (Movshon, 1975;Orban et al, 1981). The best speed was defined as the stimulus speed that elicited the greatest response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Velocity sensitivity was determined using moving stimuli of optimal orientation and direction. Units were categorized as low-pass, broadband, tuned or high-pass, according to the criteria de®ned by Orban et al (1981). (5) Precise limits of the receptive ®elds (RFs) were mapped as the`minimum response ®elds'.…”
Section: Analysis Of Visual Responses Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%