2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0362-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to methylphenidate is not influenced by DAT1 polymorphisms in a sample of Brazilian adult patients with ADHD

Abstract: Several lines of evidence suggest a relevant role for the dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene not only as a susceptibility factor for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but also as a predictor of individual methylphenidate (MPH) response. Pharmacogenetic studies of MPH response in ADHD have mainly focused on the 40-bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in the 3' untranslated region (3'-UTR) of DAT1. Most studies were performed in samples of children and conflicting findings were obtained. Only… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48,55,[57][58][59][60] Meta-analysis of the hyperactivity/impulsivity subscale revealed no significant summary effect size (d ¼ À 0.22, 95% CI: À 0.6 to 0.16, z ¼ À 1.1363, P ¼ 0.3, I 2 ¼ 84.14%, 95% CI for I 2 : 58.94-97.62%, see Figure 4a). Meta-analysis of the inattention subscale also revealed no significant summary effect size (d ¼ À 0.05, 95% CI: À 0.4 to 0.3, z ¼ À 0.2813, P ¼ 0.8, I 2 ¼ 81.88%, 95% CI for I 2 : 51.33-97.57%, see Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…48,55,[57][58][59][60] Meta-analysis of the hyperactivity/impulsivity subscale revealed no significant summary effect size (d ¼ À 0.22, 95% CI: À 0.6 to 0.16, z ¼ À 1.1363, P ¼ 0.3, I 2 ¼ 84.14%, 95% CI for I 2 : 58.94-97.62%, see Figure 4a). Meta-analysis of the inattention subscale also revealed no significant summary effect size (d ¼ À 0.05, 95% CI: À 0.4 to 0.3, z ¼ À 0.2813, P ¼ 0.8, I 2 ¼ 81.88%, 95% CI for I 2 : 51.33-97.57%, see Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…After restricting the analysis to studies in children by excluding three studies in adult subjects, 47,54,58 there was a nonsignificant effect size of d ¼ À 0.24 (95% CI: À 0.62 to 0.13, z ¼ À 1.2627, P ¼ 0.2, I 2 ¼ 56.93%, 95% CI for I 2 : 23.47-92.17%). There was evidence for a publication bias in the funnel plot and in the Egger's test (z ¼ À 2.14, P ¼ 0.03).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations