2013
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.113.001217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Myocardial Fibrosis as a Key Determinant of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Study”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 In subsequent studies, both the presence and extent of replacement fibrosis were associated with an increased likelihood of all-cause mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy and that this association was independent of LVEF, the initial clinical status, the severity of LV dilatation/dysfunction and other established prognostic factors. [27][28][29] Clinical implications and future directions Our case series study partially reconnects to previous observations confirming that evaluation of cardiac dimensions and EF in patients with VHD could be insufficient to target the best timing for treatment. The best response occurs when surgery is performed before left heart dilation, LV hypertrophy, or LV dysfunction develops.…”
Section: Pathophysiological Role Of Fibrosissupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 In subsequent studies, both the presence and extent of replacement fibrosis were associated with an increased likelihood of all-cause mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy and that this association was independent of LVEF, the initial clinical status, the severity of LV dilatation/dysfunction and other established prognostic factors. [27][28][29] Clinical implications and future directions Our case series study partially reconnects to previous observations confirming that evaluation of cardiac dimensions and EF in patients with VHD could be insufficient to target the best timing for treatment. The best response occurs when surgery is performed before left heart dilation, LV hypertrophy, or LV dysfunction develops.…”
Section: Pathophysiological Role Of Fibrosissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, patients with fibrosis had a significantly greater incidence of the secondary end point of sudden cardiac death/ventricular tachycardia 26 . In subsequent studies, both the presence and extent of replacement fibrosis were associated with an increased likelihood of all-cause mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy and that this association was independent of LVEF, the initial clinical status, the severity of LV dilatation/dysfunction and other established prognostic factors 27–29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A 10% level of EF improvement was considered clinically significant accordingly to previous studies on reverse remodeling and to our intra-observer variability (3.6%, SD = 3%). Similarly, in consideration of both recent studies on reverse remodeling [ 24 , 25 ] and our intra-observer variability (6.3%, SD = 3.3%), an “EDV improvement” was considered clinically significant if a more-than-10% reduction of baseline levels was noticed. These observations are in line with previous data from the IMPROVE-HF trial that identified non ischemic HF etiology as one of the determinants associated with a >10% improvement in EF [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other studies have found a reverse remodeling in 25–33% of the patients [ 12 , 25 ], which occurred in the first year after SV began and correlated with the absence of myocardial fibrosis in magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) [ 24 , 26 ]. It appears therefore reasonable that patients with HFrEF of non-ischemic etiology, who typically have a lower LGE extension if compared to ischemic patients, would respond better to optimal medical therapy and benefit more from SV therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a patient missed by guest on http://circimaging.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from the follow-up visit, telephone contact, review of outpatient clinic or hospital records, and contact with the patient's primary care physician or cardiologist were performed. During follow-up, we recorded the following end points as previously described 16 : (1) long runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia defined as ≥10 consecutive ventricular premature beats at >120 bpm or sustained ventricular tachycardia, (2) aborted SCD, defined as an appropriate ICD intervention for ventricular arrhythmias excluding ATP, (3) SCD defined as unexpected death either within 1 hour of cardiac symptom onset in the absence of progressive deterioration, during sleep, or within 24 hours of last being seen alive, (4) hospitalization or cardiac death related to chronic heart failure because of unstable or progressive deterioration of LV function despite active therapy. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite end point of long runs of …”
Section: Follow-up and End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%