2011
DOI: 10.1161/circgenetics.110.958603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Letter Regarding Article “Plasma Bilirubin and UGT1A1*28 Are Not Protective Factors Against First-Time Myocardial Infarction in a Prospective Nested Case-Referent Setting”

Abstract: 1 that the model for risk association between bilirubin and myocardial infarction, including body mass index, systolic blood pressure, smoking, Apo B/Apo A1, UGT-genotypes, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and albumin was not presented. The significant risk associations seen are no longer evident in this model (Table). Adjusting the model only for UGT-genotypes had almost no effect on the results.The apparent protective effect of bilirubin, reported by earlier studies, is reproduced in our material on myoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of prospective studies have shown various U‐shaped associations (i.e. low or high bilirubin levels versus intermediate levels associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease) , or no association after multifactorial adjustment . We found no association between baseline plasma bilirubin level and incident IHD or MI in the prospective CGPS after extensive multifactorial adjustment for potential confounders.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…However, the majority of prospective studies have shown various U‐shaped associations (i.e. low or high bilirubin levels versus intermediate levels associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease) , or no association after multifactorial adjustment . We found no association between baseline plasma bilirubin level and incident IHD or MI in the prospective CGPS after extensive multifactorial adjustment for potential confounders.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%