1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(83)90011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to ionising radiation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One difference between the two investigations was that Robbins et al" measured cell survival at a single radiation dose, whereas Howlett et al'54 used increasing dosages and took the slope of the resulting survival plot as the parameter for assessing sensitivity. It is noteworthy that at the dosage used by Robbins et al" (100 rad), the differences detected by Howlett et al 54 were at a minimum.…”
Section: Dna Damage and Dmd Cellsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One difference between the two investigations was that Robbins et al" measured cell survival at a single radiation dose, whereas Howlett et al'54 used increasing dosages and took the slope of the resulting survival plot as the parameter for assessing sensitivity. It is noteworthy that at the dosage used by Robbins et al" (100 rad), the differences detected by Howlett et al 54 were at a minimum.…”
Section: Dna Damage and Dmd Cellsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…There are neuropathic disorders in which increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents has been demonstrated in cells in ~u l t u r e .~~~' ,~' The rationale for examining the response of DMD cells to such agents is not clear; as Howlett et al 54 pointed out, DMD is apparently not a neuropathic disorder, nor is there evidence of an increased incidence of tumors. This has not deterred studies of this type being made in DMD, and the effects of both radiation and chemical mutagens on DMD cells have been described.…”
Section: Dna Damage and Dmd Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%