1965
DOI: 10.2307/1236333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Economic Incentive by Abakaliki Rice Farmers in Eastern Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See e.g. Hopper, 1957, Welsch, 1965, Chennareddy, 1967, Yotopoulos, 1967, Sahota, 1968 and However, the four studies examined indicate that the MVP deviated from the MFC on average by 41 percent. Naturally, this could easily indicate that a major reallocation of resources would be necessary, but in spite of that, all the studies examined report that the findings tend to confirm the Schultz hypothesis.…”
Section: The Empirical Picturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…See e.g. Hopper, 1957, Welsch, 1965, Chennareddy, 1967, Yotopoulos, 1967, Sahota, 1968 and However, the four studies examined indicate that the MVP deviated from the MFC on average by 41 percent. Naturally, this could easily indicate that a major reallocation of resources would be necessary, but in spite of that, all the studies examined report that the findings tend to confirm the Schultz hypothesis.…”
Section: The Empirical Picturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill, 1970;Jones, 1960;Norman, 1970;Welsch, 1965]. If this proposition is valid it follows that there is little scope for increasing production by improving farmers' decision-making with existing production functions.…”
Section: The Argument For a Linear Programming Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wish to thank G. Hujik for computational assistance and the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for computer facilities and assistance. 1 Except for Welsch [19] who dealt with the allocation of resources in Eastern Nigeria, the rest pertained to testing the allocation efficiency in Indian agriculture. However, these studies varied in terms of regions, sample size, number of crops, and number of inputs considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%