Response to “Commentary on: The First Global Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines for People Living With Disability”

Carty, Catherine; Ploeg, Hidde P. van der; Biddle, Stuart J. H.; Bull, Fiona; Willumsen, Juana; Lee, Lindsay; Kamenov, Kaloyan; Milton, Karen

doi:10.1123/jpah.2021-0137

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…42,43 Some recent generic guidelines take a more inclusive approach by specifically including PWD and emphasizing the 'doing some PA is better than none' message. 39,44 Studies of sedentary behaviour for PWD are nearly non-existent 38,39 and complicated by challenges in defining sedentary behaviour for people with mobility impairments. [45][46][47] Nevertheless, the recent addition of sedentary behaviour guidelines 38,39 and messages to PA guidelines may be especially important for inactive PWD.…”

Section: Insert Figure 1 About Herementioning

confidence: 99%

Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Insert Figure 1 About Herementioning

confidence: 99%

Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 11 This makes it questionable how applicable these guidelines are, and perhaps making disability-specific guidelines more suitable. 15 61 However, the current PA guidelines for people with disabilities do have their merits, as they exposed the lack of systematic research on PA in this population, 62 inspiring new studies, such as the current study, to bridge this gap. Future research should now focus on the dose–response relationships between PA and health.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Physical activity behaviour up to 1 year post-rehabilitation among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases: results of the prospective cohort study ReSpAct

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLittle is known of physical activity behaviour among adults with a disability and/or chronic disease during and up to 1 year post-rehabilitation. We aimed to explore (1) dose characteristics of physical activity behaviour among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases during that period, and (2) the effects of personal characteristics and diagnosis on the development of physical activity over time.MethodsAdults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases (N=1256), enrolled in the Rehabilitation, Sports and Active lifestyle study, were followed with questionnaires: 3–6 weeks before (T0) and 14 (T1), 33 (T2) and 52 (T3) weeks after discharge from rehabilitation. Physical activity was assessed with the adapted version of the Short Questionnaire to ASsess Health enhancing physical activity. Dose characteristics of physical activity were descriptively analysed. Multilevel regression models were performed to assess physical activity over time and the effect of personal and diagnosis characteristics on physical activity over time.ResultsMedian total physical activity ranged from 1545 (IQR: 853–2453) at T0 to 1710 (IQR: 960–2730) at T3 min/week. Household (495–600 min/week) and light-intensity (900–998 min/week) activities accrued the most minutes. Analyses showed a significant increase in total physical activity moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity physical activity and work/commuting physical activity for all time points (T1–T3) compared with baseline (T0). Diagnosis, age, sex and body mass index had a significant effect on baseline total physical activity.ConclusionPhysical activity is highly diverse among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases. Understanding this diversity in physical activity can help improve physical activity promotion activities.

show abstract

“…At least, 150–300 min of moderate intensity aerobic physical activity is set as the target in controlling risk factors 54 55…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimodal individualised intervention to prevent functional decline after stroke: protocol of a randomised controlled trial on long-term follow-up after stroke (LAST-long)

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionMultimodal interventions have emerged as new approaches to provide more targeted intervention to reduce functional decline after stroke. Still, the evidence is contradictory. The main objective of the Life After Stroke (LAST)-long trial is to investigate if monthly meetings with a stroke coordinator who offers a multimodal approach to long-term follow-up can prevent functional decline after stroke.Methods and analysisLAST-long is a pragmatic single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial recruiting participants living in six different municipalities, admitted to four hospitals in Norway. The patients are screened for inclusion and recruited into the trial 3 months after stroke. A total of 300 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomised to an intervention group receiving monthly follow-up by a community-based stroke coordinator who identifies the participants’ individual risk profile and sets up an action plan based on individual goals, or to a control group receiving standard care. All participants undergo blinded assessments at 6-month, 12-month and 18-month follow-up. Modified Rankin Scale at 18 months is primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are results of blood tests, blood pressure, adherence to secondary prophylaxis, measures of activities of daily living, cognitive function, physical function, physical activity, patient reported outcome measures, caregiver’s burden, the use and costs of health services, safety measures and measures of adherence to the intervention. Mixed models will be used to evaluate differences between the intervention and control group for all endpoints across the four time points, with treatment group, time as categorical covariates and their interaction as fixed effects, and patient as random effect.Ethics and disseminationThis trial was approved by the Regional Committee of Medical and Health Research Ethics, REC no. 2018/1809. The main results will be published in international peer-reviewed open access scientific journals and to policy-makers and end users in relevant channels.Trial registration numberClincalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03859063, registered on 1 March 2019.

show abstract

Response to “Commentary on: The First Global Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines for People Living With Disability”

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective

Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective

Physical activity behaviour up to 1 year post-rehabilitation among adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases: results of the prospective cohort study ReSpAct

Multimodal individualised intervention to prevent functional decline after stroke: protocol of a randomised controlled trial on long-term follow-up after stroke (LAST-long)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About