2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2761866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to “Comment on ‘Relation between space charge limited current and power loss in open drift tubes' ” [Phys Plasmas 14, 094705 (2007)]

Abstract: It is pointed out in this Response that as the collector plate is a grounded conductor whose potential is held fixed at zero, it is incorrect to assume that it becomes negatively charged due to the accumulation of electron space-charge. Further, the connection between the collector potential due to the assumed accumulation of charges and the impedance of the open boundary appears tenuous. Moreover, the use of the impedance in evaluating the power loss while at the same time stating that “electromagnetic effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 When the N charges move together as a single unit as in case of a linear beam below the space charge limit, the multiplying factor is in fact N 2 . 6,7,12,13 In Ref. Thus, for a beam of electrons, the macroparticle has a charge q = Ne and mass M = Nm 0 , where e and m 0 are the charge and mass of an electron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 When the N charges move together as a single unit as in case of a linear beam below the space charge limit, the multiplying factor is in fact N 2 . 6,7,12,13 In Ref. Thus, for a beam of electrons, the macroparticle has a charge q = Ne and mass M = Nm 0 , where e and m 0 are the charge and mass of an electron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%