1997
DOI: 10.1177/001440299706300408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, translation of this research into routine educational practice has not always been observed (e.g., Camine, 1997;Stone, 1998). Explanations for the poor track record for translating research to practice are many and include such considerations as (a) limited trustworthiness, usability, and accessibility of educational research (Camine, 1997; Billups, 1997); (b) inconsistent research findings (Billups, 1997); and (c) research presentations that are unattractive or inaccessible to practitioners and research that ignores teachers' beliefs about change and expected outcomes (Richardson, Anders, Tidwell, & Lloyd, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, translation of this research into routine educational practice has not always been observed (e.g., Camine, 1997;Stone, 1998). Explanations for the poor track record for translating research to practice are many and include such considerations as (a) limited trustworthiness, usability, and accessibility of educational research (Camine, 1997; Billups, 1997); (b) inconsistent research findings (Billups, 1997); and (c) research presentations that are unattractive or inaccessible to practitioners and research that ignores teachers' beliefs about change and expected outcomes (Richardson, Anders, Tidwell, & Lloyd, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, beyond the discipline of management accounting, numerous commentators on the researchpractice gap have voiced a range of opinions on how this gap may be bridged. For example, focusing on solving specific practice-based problems (Keefer and Stone, 2009); relying on managerial sensibility to shape research questions (Gulati, 2007); taking sabbaticals in industry (Rynes, et al, 2001); developing consulting relationships with organizations (Mohrman, Gibson, and Mohrman, 2001); confronting questions and anomalies existing in reality, (Van de Ven and Johnson, 2006); practitioners reviewing for academic journals, Cohen (2007); using consultants to bridge the gap (Gopinath and Hoffman, 1995); changing university incentive schemes to enable practitioner-based research to be afforded a higher credibility (Vermeulen, 2005); holding joint symposia, bringing academics and practitioners together (Keefer and Stone, 2009); and, creating awards to recognize those who relate research to practice (Billups, 1997). This is not an exhaustive list of initiatives proposed to bridge the gap.…”
Section: Nothing More Practical Than a Good Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional staff development typically takes the form of brief lectures or workshops, with little or no support or follow-up, that may or may not address the individual needs of the teachers. Further, information is often presented in packaged programs that may not accurately reflect the original research (Billups, 1997). In addition to the typical disadvantages of traditional staff development that most schools experience, rural school districts specifically are presented with the obstacles of limited access to training, minimal ongoing support in the application of new concepts, and increased expense (Knapczyk, Rhodes, & Brush, 1994;Storer & Crosswait, 1995).…”
Section: Traditional Staff Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%