“…Certainly, beyond the discipline of management accounting, numerous commentators on the researchpractice gap have voiced a range of opinions on how this gap may be bridged. For example, focusing on solving specific practice-based problems (Keefer and Stone, 2009); relying on managerial sensibility to shape research questions (Gulati, 2007); taking sabbaticals in industry (Rynes, et al, 2001); developing consulting relationships with organizations (Mohrman, Gibson, and Mohrman, 2001); confronting questions and anomalies existing in reality, (Van de Ven and Johnson, 2006); practitioners reviewing for academic journals, Cohen (2007); using consultants to bridge the gap (Gopinath and Hoffman, 1995); changing university incentive schemes to enable practitioner-based research to be afforded a higher credibility (Vermeulen, 2005); holding joint symposia, bringing academics and practitioners together (Keefer and Stone, 2009); and, creating awards to recognize those who relate research to practice (Billups, 1997). This is not an exhaustive list of initiatives proposed to bridge the gap.…”