2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-020-04889-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Amore and Fernandez

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conjecture that the algorithm used by those authors does not yield the eigenvalues orderly and for that reason they have been picking out the eigenvalues randomly which explains the discontinuity in CC's figure 1 [1] that does not appear in our more careful calculation given in figure 2 of our comment [3]. Figure 3 shows present results λ(ν) (blue, continuous line) and those given by CC [4] in their reply (red circles). It is clear that the discontinuity in the figure 1 of their first paper [1] is due to a jump from the lowest eigenvalue to the next higher one as conjectured in our Comment [3].…”
Section: Addendummentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conjecture that the algorithm used by those authors does not yield the eigenvalues orderly and for that reason they have been picking out the eigenvalues randomly which explains the discontinuity in CC's figure 1 [1] that does not appear in our more careful calculation given in figure 2 of our comment [3]. Figure 3 shows present results λ(ν) (blue, continuous line) and those given by CC [4] in their reply (red circles). It is clear that the discontinuity in the figure 1 of their first paper [1] is due to a jump from the lowest eigenvalue to the next higher one as conjectured in our Comment [3].…”
Section: Addendummentioning
confidence: 81%
“…After the Comment [3] and Reply [4] were published we could finally reproduce CC's results [1,4] by simply solving the eigenvalue equation for the Mathieu function as shown by Coïsson et al [5]. Table 2 shows a(ν) for q = 0.8147872 and ν = 1, 2, 3, 4.…”
Section: Addendummentioning
confidence: 97%