2021
DOI: 10.1111/camh.12534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response: “The Signal and the Noise”—a response to Clayton et al. (2021)

Abstract: The purpose of this response is to clarify points about the steps we took in a systematic review of the literature and to reaffirm our findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no robust empirical evidence that puberty blockers reduce suicidality or suicide rates (Biggs, 2020 ; Clayton et al, 2021 ). The authors of the paper, that was the basis for The Lancet’s claim, subsequently clarified that they were not making any causal claims that puberty blockers decreased suicidality (Rew et al, 2021 ). Another paper, claiming to have found that barriers to gender-affirming care was associated with suicidality, had to withdraw this claim in a significant correction to their article (Zwickl et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Gender-affirming Treatment For Youth With Gender Dysphoria: ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no robust empirical evidence that puberty blockers reduce suicidality or suicide rates (Biggs, 2020 ; Clayton et al, 2021 ). The authors of the paper, that was the basis for The Lancet’s claim, subsequently clarified that they were not making any causal claims that puberty blockers decreased suicidality (Rew et al, 2021 ). Another paper, claiming to have found that barriers to gender-affirming care was associated with suicidality, had to withdraw this claim in a significant correction to their article (Zwickl et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Gender-affirming Treatment For Youth With Gender Dysphoria: ...mentioning
confidence: 99%