2019
DOI: 10.24423/engtrans.1012.20190502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Surfaces in the Numerical Homogenization of Non-Linear Porous Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the standard method, the response function (functions) computation begins with a limited number of points, and the accuracy of the resulting approximation is checked at a few chosen verification points. If the quality is inadequate, refinement points are added to change the response surface . The Design Expert program offers three alternative RSM designs: central composite, Box–Behnken, and optimal designs.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to the standard method, the response function (functions) computation begins with a limited number of points, and the accuracy of the resulting approximation is checked at a few chosen verification points. If the quality is inadequate, refinement points are added to change the response surface . The Design Expert program offers three alternative RSM designs: central composite, Box–Behnken, and optimal designs.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the quality is inadequate, refinement points are added to change the response surface. 32 The Design Expert program offers three alternative RSM designs: central composite, Box–Behnken, and optimal designs. The optimal (custom) design is used in this study.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations