1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-874x(94)90102-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response spectrum of underground protective structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore only the first loading phase is considered Hinman 1988, 1991;Alwis and Lam 1994). As stated in the methodology, when analyzing the RBM, the structural deflection is ignored thus the structure is assumed as a rigid body.…”
Section: Rigid Body Motion Of the Entire Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore only the first loading phase is considered Hinman 1988, 1991;Alwis and Lam 1994). As stated in the methodology, when analyzing the RBM, the structural deflection is ignored thus the structure is assumed as a rigid body.…”
Section: Rigid Body Motion Of the Entire Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the effects of structure motion on the soil flow near the structure and subsequent change in the structural loads and response were analyzed for a detonation very close to a structure (Baylot 2000). However, almost all the available analytical studies of underground structure dynamic response are based on single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models (Weidlinger and Hinman 1988;Alwis and Lam 1994;Chen and Chen 1996), which can be categorized into two approaches: 1) considering the entire structure as an rigid SDOF system, whereas the local response of the structural element is neglected; 2) simplifying a structural element as an SDOF system, whereas the global response of the structure was ignored. In fact, the SSI relies on the structural deformation;, therefore, a more appropriate consideration of the SSI requires adopting a continuous model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high risk of underground explosions necessitates careful research on the response of underground RC structures to these events. The dynamic response of underground RC structures to underground explosions has been numerically studied by several researchers [1][2][3]. Lu et al used 2-and 3-dimensional numerical models to analyze the response of underground structures subjected to subsurface explosions which occurred in the soil medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Alwis and Lam (1994) studied the rigid body response of underground protective structures under exponentially decreasing blast load using an SDOF model.…”
Section: Research On In-structure Shock Of Underground Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a typical detonation case, the most important phase is the first one, in which the maximum acceleration and velocity of the entire structure always occur. Therefore only the first loading phase is considered Hinman 1988, 1991;Alwis and Lam 1994). As stated in the methodology, when analyzing the RBM, the structural deflection is ignored thus the structure is assumed as a rigid body.…”
Section: Rigid Body Motion Of the Whole Structurementioning
confidence: 99%