1985
DOI: 10.1038/317641a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response regulation and sensory control in Halobacterium halobium based on an oscillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
47
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7) (33,34). This was concluded from the finding that the responsiveness of bacteria to attractant stimuli (370 nm step-down) depends on the delay time between spontaneous reversal and stimulus application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) (33,34). This was concluded from the finding that the responsiveness of bacteria to attractant stimuli (370 nm step-down) depends on the delay time between spontaneous reversal and stimulus application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first 500 ms after a reversal the cells were absolutely refractory to repellent stimuli (10). With shortinterval cells the weak repellent stimulus led to a repellent response only when delivered shortly after the refractory period; with prolonged delay the result was an inverse (attractant) response ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response is defined as an attractant response when the interval is longer, and as a repellent response when it is shorter, than the average spontaneous interval. applied 2 s after a spontaneous reversal had been observed, because in cells with a normal interval length the largest responsiveness had been found at that moment during an interval (10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations