2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2256229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response reduction methods for base isolated buildings with collision to retaining walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of a new seismic isolation device in protecting the structure under near-fault (NF) ground motions, namely, the roll-in-cage (RNC) isolator, was assessed (Ismail et al, 2014a(Ismail et al, , 2014b; Ismail et al (2015) investigated the effectiveness of the RNC isolator with a built-in braking mechanism against pounding. Kishida et al (2017) discussed response reduction methods, including a new damper capable of changing the damping force as a function of input displacement and velocity, for base-isolated structures experiencing pounding. Morales (2021) focused particularly on strong-motion records and their importance on base motion of the isolated structures analyzed in frequency domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effectiveness of a new seismic isolation device in protecting the structure under near-fault (NF) ground motions, namely, the roll-in-cage (RNC) isolator, was assessed (Ismail et al, 2014a(Ismail et al, , 2014b; Ismail et al (2015) investigated the effectiveness of the RNC isolator with a built-in braking mechanism against pounding. Kishida et al (2017) discussed response reduction methods, including a new damper capable of changing the damping force as a function of input displacement and velocity, for base-isolated structures experiencing pounding. Morales (2021) focused particularly on strong-motion records and their importance on base motion of the isolated structures analyzed in frequency domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one involves the control of the peak displacement of the isolation layer by modifying the properties of the isolation layer (Ismail et al, 2014a, 2014b; Morales, 2021). The second approach introduces shock-absorbers (bumpers) between the isolation layer and the moat wall to absorb the impact effects during collision (Kishida et al, 2017; Komodromos, 2008; Polycarpou and Komodromos, 2011, 2013; Tsai, 1997). These two approaches could also be employed simultaneously (Ismail et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%