2000
DOI: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1202_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Rate Comparisons of E-Mail- and Mail-Distributed Student Evaluations

Abstract: Although the findings have limited generalizability because of low response rates and small sample sizes, the results suggest caution when using e-mail to collect curriculum evaluations from 4th-year medical students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
47
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
47
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific tracking of the number of lost e-mails and the time the e-mail survey was started, replied to, and deleted can improve sampling procedures [73]. The e-mail survey can also increase response quality.…”
Section: Survey Design and Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specific tracking of the number of lost e-mails and the time the e-mail survey was started, replied to, and deleted can improve sampling procedures [73]. The e-mail survey can also increase response quality.…”
Section: Survey Design and Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The e-mail survey can also increase response quality. This is because respondents are prone to give longer, more detailed, and plainer responses by e-mail compared to other types of surveys [73,74].…”
Section: Survey Design and Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By precise tracking of e-mailed surveys, the researcher can know the number of undeliverable e-mail as well as what time the e-mail survey was opened, replied to and deleted. This can improve sampling procedures [75]. People are apt to give longer open-ended responses to e-mail, which tend to be more candid, than other types of surveys.…”
Section: Survey Design and Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People are apt to give longer open-ended responses to e-mail, which tend to be more candid, than other types of surveys. This can also increase response quality [75,76] by avoiding the problem of social desirability and interviewer biases, both well-known problems of face-to-face interview surveys [77].…”
Section: Survey Design and Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McDonald and Adam; 28 and Paolo et al, 29 as some examples), the authors also investigated whether informants would switch modes of filling out the survey, if given that option.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%