Response of viner peas to water during different phases of growth

Stoker, R.

doi:10.1080/03015521.1973.10427620

Cited by 10 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some caution is necessary when these results are compared with those on a shallow soil (Stoker 1973), as that crop was harvested at the green stage. However, both the actual increase in yield and the percentage yield response were less on the better soil type.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been shown (Stoker 1973;Anderson & White 1974) that all yield components are usually increased by irrigation. Number of seeds per pod and 1000-seed weight were generally increased by irrigation, significantly so in some treatments (Table 5).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, positive (Thomas & Van Lindert 1962), negative (Salter 1962), and nil (Carter 1960) yield responses to vegetative irrigation have all been obtained, and the response is not obviously related to soil type or climate. Stoker (1973) examined the effect of irrigating garden peas at different growth stages and soil moisture levels on a Lismore Stony Silt Loam. This soil is only about 350 mm deep and overlies deep shingle beds.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Irrigation of garden peas on a good cropping soil

Stoker¹

1977

New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Irrigation of garden peas on a good cropping soil

Stoker¹

1977

New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Large yield responses of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) to irrigation are frequently obtained in New Zealand, where recurrent and variable drought is one of the chief causes of season-to-season variation in pea seed yields in unirrigated crops (Stoker 1973;Martin & Tabley 1981).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of timing and intensity of drought on the growth and yield of field peas (Pisum sativumL.)

Martin

Jamieson

1996

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) to timing and intensity of drought was determined in an experiment in a mobile rainshelter, which excluded rainfall during growth of the crop. Twelve irrigation treatments subjected the crops to drought of varying duration at different stages during plant growth. Before and after the drought, the crops were fully irrigated. Pea seed yield decreased linearly as the maximum potential soil moisture deficit (D pmax ) experienced during the growth of the crop increased from 49 to 323 mm. The timing of D pmax did not affect the decline in pea seed yield, but did affect the total dry matter (DM) produced by the crop. If D pmax occurred before flowering, radiation interception and total DM yield were reduced more than if D pmax occurred after flowering. However, this total yield reduction was completely offset by an increase in individual pea weight and consequently an increased harvest index. Pea seed yield was closely related to pod number per unit area, which was also strongly related to water stress. The number of peas per pod was unaffected by water stress.

show abstract

“…Stoker (1973) measured much greater yield responses in the same season on a shallow Lismore soil by ensuring adequate water from flowering.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Yield of green peas

Anderson¹,

White

1974

New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green peas (cv. 'Victory Freezer') were grown at five plant densities (52 90 105 182 358 plants/m 2 ) and three soil moisture treatments: natural rainfall, irrigatio~ at flo~ering and pod swelling, and water stress at these periods. Both total green yield and green pea yield increased with increasing density, although green pea yield dropped slightly below 182 plants/m 2 • No significant differences occurred between natural rainfall and water stress treatments. Irrigation gave an 87% increase in total green weight and a 56% increase in green pea yield. There was no indication of maximum yield occurring at a higher population under irrigation than under dryland conditions. Dryland peas matured 5-7 days earlier than those irrigated, the highest density heing 2-4 days earlier than the lowest.Total vine length, full pods per plant, ovule initials pel' pod, peas per pod, and percentage of peas and pods at higher nodes all increased with decreasing plant density and irrigation.Vine length to the first pod and percentage of peas > 11.1 mm sieve size increased with irrigation. The percentage of peas < 7.9 mm increased with decreasing plant density, and the reverse occurred with the percentage of pale peas.Highest mature seed yields were obtained at 105 plants/m 2 • The response to irrigation was similar to that for green peas.Practical implications of these results are discussed.

show abstract

Response of viner peas to water during different phases of growth

Cited by 10 publications

References 6 publications

Irrigation of garden peas on a good cropping soil

Irrigation of garden peas on a good cropping soil

Effect of timing and intensity of drought on the growth and yield of field peas (Pisum sativumL.)

Yield of green peas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About