2007
DOI: 10.4308/hjb.14.3.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Various Tomato Genotypes to Begomovirus Infection and Its Improved Diagnostic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, false negatives can also occur, as we unexpectedly observed with three samples corresponding to BGMV isolates that could not be detected using the specific probe, probably due to the poor quality of the extracted DNA or a low viral titer [1]. On the other hand, only 21.2% of the symptomatic common bean samples were infected with begomoviruses; therefore, the remaining samples could have been infected by other viruses [1,19] or affected by herbicides [21]. In this work, we detected and characterized BBSV, a new begomovirus infecting common bean crops in Argentina.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, false negatives can also occur, as we unexpectedly observed with three samples corresponding to BGMV isolates that could not be detected using the specific probe, probably due to the poor quality of the extracted DNA or a low viral titer [1]. On the other hand, only 21.2% of the symptomatic common bean samples were infected with begomoviruses; therefore, the remaining samples could have been infected by other viruses [1,19] or affected by herbicides [21]. In this work, we detected and characterized BBSV, a new begomovirus infecting common bean crops in Argentina.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The use of specific detection probes can help us to demonstrate the presence of previously reported begomoviruses or to provide clues regarding the presence of still unknown viruses. However, false negatives can also occur, as we unexpectedly observed with three samples corresponding to BGMV isolates that could not be detected using the specific probe, probably due to the poor quality of the extracted DNA or a low viral titer [1]. On the other hand, only 21.2% of the symptomatic common bean samples were infected with begomoviruses; therefore, the remaining samples could have been infected by other viruses [1,19] or affected by herbicides [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%