2012
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/l17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the Photospheric Magnetic Field to the X2.2 Flare on 2011 February 15

Abstract: It is well known that the long-term evolution of the photospheric magnetic field plays an important role in building up free energy to power solar eruptions. Observations, despite being controversial, have also revealed a rapid and permanent variation of the photospheric magnetic field in response to the coronal magnetic field restructuring during the eruption. The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager instrument (HMI) on board the newly launched Solar Dynamics Observatory produces seeing-free full-disk vector magn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
114
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
25
114
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Local changes in the horizontal photospheric magnetic fields were also recently reported (e.g. Wang et al 2002;Sun et al 2012;Wang et al 2012;Petrie 2013), while in those studies, the vertical field component does not change much.…”
Section: Electric Currents In Observations and Their Associations Wisupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Local changes in the horizontal photospheric magnetic fields were also recently reported (e.g. Wang et al 2002;Sun et al 2012;Wang et al 2012;Petrie 2013), while in those studies, the vertical field component does not change much.…”
Section: Electric Currents In Observations and Their Associations Wisupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The sign of this change remains inconclusive, however, since both, an increase of the shear (Wang 1992;Chen et al 1994;Wang et al 1994Wang et al , 2012aLiu et al 2005;Petrie 2012), as well as a decrease has been found during flares (Wang 2006). To explain such contradictory results, Dun et al (2007) proposed that the measures for the non-potentiality of a magnetic field may take on different values from one portion of an AR to another.…”
Section: Coronal Implosion and Photospheric Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years, high-resolution white-light sunspot observations revealed some changes in photospheric fine structures caused by flares, e.g., disappearing penumbra fibrils and transition bright grains could evolve into faculae (Wang et al 2012a), granulation pattern could evolve to alternating dark and bright penumbra fibril structures (Wang et al 2013), and there were remarkable high-speed flows along the flaring PILs (Shimizu et al 2014). On the other hand, the photospheric vector magnetic-field observations showed that the horizontal magnetic fields increased rapidly and permanently around the central PILs (Wang & Liu 2010;Liu et al 2012;Petrie 2012;Sun et al 2012;Wang et al 2012bWang et al , 2012c, while they decreased significantly in the outer regions (Wang et al 2009;Li et al 2011;Sun et al 2012). These results thus suggested that, after major flares, the magnetic fields often became more horizontal in the central PIL regions but more vertical in the decaying penumbra regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the LF changes can be understood as a proxy for the pressure changes from the upper atmosphere to the photosphere. More recently, it was found that during major flares the sudden photospheric magnetic structure changes in their central regions close to the main flaring PILs might have been accompanied by obvious LF changes, such as the downward LF changes Petrie 2012;Sun et al 2012;Wang et al 2012bWang et al , 2012c, the horizontal LF changes providing torque for rapid sunspot rotation (Wang et al 2014) or abrupt torsional force for relaxing magnetic twist near the PILs (Petrie 2013), and so on. Besides the central regions, as mentioned above, the peripheral penumbra regions can decay clearly in some major flares.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%