2003
DOI: 10.1177/0748730403251805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the Mouse Circadian System to Serotonin 1A/2/7 Agonists in vivo: Surprisingly Little

Abstract: Serotonin (5-HT) is thought to play a role in regulating nonphotic phase shifts and modulating photic phase shifts of the mammalian circadian system, but results with different species (rats vs. hamsters) and techniques (in vivo vs. in vitro; systemic vs. intracerebral drug delivery) have been discordant. Here we examined the effects of the 5-HT1A/7 agonist 8-OH-DPAT and the 5-HT1/2 agonist quipazine on the circadian system in mice, with some parallel experiments conducted with hamsters for comparative purpose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(85 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrical stimulation of the median raphe phase shifts circadian activity rhythms in a non-photic pattern, producing the most significant phase changes during the day, and smaller phase delays during the night (MeyerBernstein and Morin 1999). This is similar to the effect of systemic injections of serotonin agonists in hamsters (Bobrzynska et al 1996) or mice (Horikawa and Shibata 2004; but see Antle et al 2003). The rhythm in firing rate in vitro can also be reset by serotonin agonists in a dose-dependent manner in hamster, rat and mouse (Biello and Dafters 2001;Prosser 2001Prosser , 2003.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Electrical stimulation of the median raphe phase shifts circadian activity rhythms in a non-photic pattern, producing the most significant phase changes during the day, and smaller phase delays during the night (MeyerBernstein and Morin 1999). This is similar to the effect of systemic injections of serotonin agonists in hamsters (Bobrzynska et al 1996) or mice (Horikawa and Shibata 2004; but see Antle et al 2003). The rhythm in firing rate in vitro can also be reset by serotonin agonists in a dose-dependent manner in hamster, rat and mouse (Biello and Dafters 2001;Prosser 2001Prosser , 2003.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…While the change in phase angle of entrainment is consistent with a change in free-running period, we cannot exclude the possibility that methylphenidate may alter phase angle of entrainment by altering circadian responses to light either by altering monoamine tone in the SCN or by altering activity levels. Both monoamines and activity have been shown to attenuate phase shifts to light (Antle et al, 2003;Mistlberger and Antle, 1998;Rea and Pickard, 2000). The observation that phase angle required over a week to return to baseline after the end of methylphenidate indicates that the phase of the circadian clock was delayed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mice there is only one report of non-photic phase shifts, and these shifts were small, averaging only about 40 min [10]. Furthermore, in vivo, 8-OH-DPAT produces non-photic phase shifts in hamsters [18] but not mice [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%