2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl076908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the Land‐Atmosphere System Over North‐Central Oklahoma During the 2017 Eclipse

Abstract: On 21 August 2017, a solar eclipse occurred over the continental United States resulting in a rapid reduction and subsequent increase of solar radiation over a large region of the country. The eclipse's effect on the land‐atmosphere system is documented in unprecedented detail using a unique array of sensors deployed at three sites in north‐central Oklahoma. The observations showed that turbulent fluxes of heat and momentum at the surface responded quickly to the change in solar radiation. The decrease in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The top of the PBL following the eclipse (1.4 km) was about 0.2 km lower prior to the eclipse. A pronounced time lag of about 1 h in boundary layer collapse and restoration is noted in both the DWL and 915-Hz SNR and SW measurements, consistent with more limited measurements during previous solar eclipse events (Turner et al 2018). Further inspection of the DWL w patterns reveals the presence of regular wave motions, which appear to be most significant near the capping inversion around the time of totality.…”
Section: Observed Planetary Boundary Layer Responsesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The top of the PBL following the eclipse (1.4 km) was about 0.2 km lower prior to the eclipse. A pronounced time lag of about 1 h in boundary layer collapse and restoration is noted in both the DWL and 915-Hz SNR and SW measurements, consistent with more limited measurements during previous solar eclipse events (Turner et al 2018). Further inspection of the DWL w patterns reveals the presence of regular wave motions, which appear to be most significant near the capping inversion around the time of totality.…”
Section: Observed Planetary Boundary Layer Responsesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The response of solar radiation and its reduction observed by the Kentucky Mesonet is consistent with the findings from Lee et al (2018) and Turner et al (2018). Note that the observations from the latter study were not exposed to the full total eclipse and did not focus on the surface meteorology, possibly because data were collected from only three locations.…”
Section: Synoptic Environmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stable surface layer during the eclipse was flanked by very unstable conditions before and after, which is typical for a day in August. In Oklahoma, where the maximum obscuration was only 89%, the boundary layer dynamics showed a similar pattern: a convective boundary layer of ~1.3‐km depth collapsed to a stable boundary layer (~200–300‐m depth) during the eclipse, and became convective again (~1.3‐km depth) afterward (Turner et al, ). Although we observed large variations in K ↓ , R n , LE , and H , the concomitant decreases in T air were relatively muted at ~1.5–2.5 °C (Figures e and h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At sites that were unaffected by convective activity (forest and prairie), there was a particularly strong eclipse effect that elicited rapid declines and increases in σ u , σ w , LE , and H . In general, the dynamics of air temperature, turbulence, radiation, and energy fluxes and stability displayed the expected responses to the eclipse solar forcing (Antonia et al, ; Eaton et al, ; Foken et al, ; Mauder et al, ; Stewart & Rouse, ; Turner et al, ). There were large changes in the surface energy balance between first and fourth contacts, with LE being completely suppressed and the direction of H changing from away from to toward the surface, which resulted in a strong stabilization of the surface layer (Figures e and h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%