1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb04940.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of T‐beta CD8+ lymphocytosis‐associated neutropenia to G‐CSF

Abstract: Only limited data are reported on the response to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) of large granular lymphocytosis-associated neutropenia. We report features of such a case who developed a suppurating leg ulcer following a dog bite. G-CSF was used to increase the neutrophil count, allowing the ulcer to be successfully skin grafted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunosuppressive therapies like the application of low-dose methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide, or cyclosporine slowly and effectively alleviate neutropenia while the effect of using granulocyte-macrophagecolony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone is usually partial and transient [10,19]. So, the hematopoietic growth factors may be more useful for rapid neutropenia correction in febrile neutropenia patients and conditions in combination with other agents [20][21][22]. Splenectomy was not recommended as a first-line therapy owing to the lack of evidence for the splenic destruction of neutrophils in LGL leukemia and insufficient data on its efficacy in treating the LGL leukemiarelated neutropenia [10,19].…”
Section: Abnormal Neutropenia In Lgl Leukemia Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunosuppressive therapies like the application of low-dose methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide, or cyclosporine slowly and effectively alleviate neutropenia while the effect of using granulocyte-macrophagecolony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone is usually partial and transient [10,19]. So, the hematopoietic growth factors may be more useful for rapid neutropenia correction in febrile neutropenia patients and conditions in combination with other agents [20][21][22]. Splenectomy was not recommended as a first-line therapy owing to the lack of evidence for the splenic destruction of neutrophils in LGL leukemia and insufficient data on its efficacy in treating the LGL leukemiarelated neutropenia [10,19].…”
Section: Abnormal Neutropenia In Lgl Leukemia Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common indication for therapy is recurrent infections secondary to neutropenia. Both G-CSF and GM-CSF improve neutropenia in these patients and are especially beneficial in patients with severe infections [85,86]. Patients with Felty's syndrome may develop autoimmune complications from G-CSF, including vasculitis, arthralgias, and thrombocytopenia, necessitating discontinuation of therapy or lowering of the dose [87].…”
Section: Natural History Prognosis and Therapy Of Lgl Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%