1994
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90135-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of structural concrete elements to severe impulsive loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to available experimental results, with increasing strain rate, tensile and compressive strength of concrete remarkably will be increased [47][48][49][50], its elasticity modulus somewhat will be larger [47,51], the propagation process of cracks [47,52] is changed and ultimate strain of concrete also is increased [53,54]. At high strain rates, steel material's strength often up to 50%, compressive strength of concrete to 100% and tensile strength of concrete up to 600% increase [55].…”
Section: Solving Equation Of Sdof With Considering Effect Of High Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to available experimental results, with increasing strain rate, tensile and compressive strength of concrete remarkably will be increased [47][48][49][50], its elasticity modulus somewhat will be larger [47,51], the propagation process of cracks [47,52] is changed and ultimate strain of concrete also is increased [53,54]. At high strain rates, steel material's strength often up to 50%, compressive strength of concrete to 100% and tensile strength of concrete up to 600% increase [55].…”
Section: Solving Equation Of Sdof With Considering Effect Of High Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to impact analysis, much research about the impact loading of vehicles, missiles, and airplanes as well as the impact behavior of various materials and components has been conducted (Kim et al 2011;Krauthammer et al 1994;Zaouk et al 1996). However, There has been limited research with respect to probabilistic impact resistance capacity evaluation for a concrete structural component under impact loading.…”
Section: Analysis Details Of Rc Columns Under Impact Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental observations indicate that the transverse motions of a beam have a finite maximum wave speed irrespective of the wavelength (Jones, 2011). As for the TBT, it is able to account for not only rotatory inertia but also shear deformation (Timoshenko, 1921); its governing equations can be solved using the finite difference (Krauthammer et al, 1993a(Krauthammer et al, , 1993b(Krauthammer et al, , 1994 or FE (Dragos and Wu, 2014;Wu and Sheikh, 2013) formulation, but the latter is more straightforward for a subsequent whole structural analysis when it is implemented in a general FE code, such as LS-DYNA (Hallquist, 2007). Due to the high cost of blast experimental programs and some limitations from security concerns, the HFPB method has been widely adopted by researchers for the analysis of RC columns (Bao and Li, 2010;Shi et al, 2008;Williams and Williamson, 2011) and structures (Jayasooriya et al, 2011;Luccioni et al, 2004;Shi et al, 2010) against blast loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available blast analysis methods for RC components are typically based on the single-degreeof-freedom (SDOF) system (Biggs, 1964), EulerBernoulli beam theory (EBT) (Carta and Stochino, 2013), Timoshenko beam theory (TBT) (Krauthammer et al, 1993a(Krauthammer et al, , 1993b(Krauthammer et al, , 1994, and high-fidelity physicsbased (HFPB) finite element (FE) methods (Bao and Li, 2010;Crawford et al, 2012;Crawford and Magallanes, 2011;Hao and Hao, 2014;Magnusson et al, 2010;Shi et al, 2008). Although the SDOF method has the capability to account for the combined effects of flexure, shear, and axial force using a specifically derived resistance function, its overly simplified assumption generally leads to unreliable and inaccurate results (El-Dakhakhni et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%