2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of steel-concrete composite panels to in-plane loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they separate suddenly after buckling. The peak steel stress values at the locations of the crack surfaces were calculated as [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they separate suddenly after buckling. The peak steel stress values at the locations of the crack surfaces were calculated as [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel-plate concrete (SC) composite shear walls used or proposed for construction in the United States are constructed using steel faceplates, infill concrete, and connectors used to anchor the steel faceplates together and to the infill concrete. Although the seismic behavior of SC walls has been studied in some detail over the past 25+ years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], the number of applications to date has been limited. Empirical equations to predict the initial stiffness and 2 lateral load capacity of SC walls have been proposed, but effects of key design variables, including wall aspect ratio, reinforcement and slenderness ratios, axial load, and material properties have not been systemically accounted for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%