1983
DOI: 10.30843/nzpp.1983.36.9590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of seedling gorse to fertilisers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of different weeds to increasing nutrient levels varies widely (Vengris et al, 1955;Hoveland et al,, 1976), For example, Austin et al (1985) showed that, for six thistle species, Carthamus lanatus achieved maximum relative yield at low nutrient concentrations and Cirsium vulgare at high nutrient concentrations. Once the nutrient responses of individual weed and pasture species are known, then it may be possible to manipulate the botanical composition of pastures by varying fertilizer application (Charles, 1968) and even to discourage the growth and development of the weedy species (Thrasher et al, 1963;Ivens & Mlowe, 1983), Moreover, the competitive advantage of one species over another may be modified or even reversed by changes in nutrient status (Williams, 1962). Hence, under conditions of high fertility, as in old subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) pastures, C. lanatus can be suppressed by pasture and other weed species alike (Michael, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of different weeds to increasing nutrient levels varies widely (Vengris et al, 1955;Hoveland et al,, 1976), For example, Austin et al (1985) showed that, for six thistle species, Carthamus lanatus achieved maximum relative yield at low nutrient concentrations and Cirsium vulgare at high nutrient concentrations. Once the nutrient responses of individual weed and pasture species are known, then it may be possible to manipulate the botanical composition of pastures by varying fertilizer application (Charles, 1968) and even to discourage the growth and development of the weedy species (Thrasher et al, 1963;Ivens & Mlowe, 1983), Moreover, the competitive advantage of one species over another may be modified or even reversed by changes in nutrient status (Williams, 1962). Hence, under conditions of high fertility, as in old subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) pastures, C. lanatus can be suppressed by pasture and other weed species alike (Michael, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both grasses and legumes can be used to suppress weed seedling emergence and survival [92,93]. However, grass species such as Lolium perenne are more suppressive than legumes against weeds as they provide higher ground cover density than legumes [92], so can compete strongly with the seedlings of weeds [94,95].…”
Section: Agronomic Tactics For Pasture Weed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%