1963
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-112-28123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Rats with Gastric Fistulas to Injection of Gastrin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we can see from table II, our results agree with those already published (1,4,11,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). In fact, it has been shown that the doses which induce a maximal stimulation in rat vary considerably from author to author between 4 infusion of saline at the speed of 2.2 ml/h, doubling the dose of secretagogue each hour and sampling the gastric secretion every 30 min -a method which corre sponds to our step-dose technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As we can see from table II, our results agree with those already published (1,4,11,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). In fact, it has been shown that the doses which induce a maximal stimulation in rat vary considerably from author to author between 4 infusion of saline at the speed of 2.2 ml/h, doubling the dose of secretagogue each hour and sampling the gastric secretion every 30 min -a method which corre sponds to our step-dose technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The same observation was made by Adashek & Grossman (1963) Schayer & Ivy (1957) concluded that histamine released from the rat mucosa is a blood-borne gastric secretory hormone. They injected fasted rats with 14C-histidine and with aminoguanidine to inhibit bistaminase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar differences have been encountered in the rat following stimulation by gastrin and histamine (Kahlson, Rosengren, Svahn, and Thunberg, 1964;Adashek and Grossman, 1963). If it becomes accepted that gastrin acts by releasing histamine, then, as Kahlson points out, the difference may represent an intracellular mobilization of histamine in proximity to the receptor sites, thus achieving a higher local concentration than is possible with histamine reaching the secretory cell from the outside.…”
Section: O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o°r Elationship Of the Responses Of The Twomentioning
confidence: 75%