2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep14605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of plant nutrient stoichiometry to fertilization varied with plant tissues in a tropical forest

Abstract: Plant N:P ratios are widely used as indices of nutrient limitation in terrestrial ecosystems, but the response of these metrics in different plant tissues to altered N and P availability and their interactions remains largely unclear. We evaluated changes in N and P concentrations, N:P ratios of new leaves (<1 yr), older leaves (>1 yr), stems and mixed fine roots of seven species after 3-years of an N and P addition experiment in a tropical forest. Nitrogen addition only increased fine root N concentrations. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(68 reference statements)
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Small within‐species sample size and high species turnover among sites prevented us from assessing how much of this response was explained by taxonomic or environmental controls. In Amazonian tree species, foliar P and Ca concentrations are more sensitive to environmental variation in soil availability than N and Mg concentrations (Fyllas et al ., ), and experimental nutrient addition in tropical forests show that both foliar and wood P concentrations respond more strongly to nutrient addition than do N concentrations (Harrington et al ., ; Ostertag, ; Schreeg et al ., ; Mo et al ., ). Wood Ca and P may also be more sensitive than other elements to soil conditions due to respective variation in the soil available nutrient pools, because the ranges of soil available Ca (115‐fold) and P (90‐fold) were vastly greater than the variation in Mg (38‐fold), K (20‐fold) and inorganic N (sixfold) among the 10 plots sampled (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Small within‐species sample size and high species turnover among sites prevented us from assessing how much of this response was explained by taxonomic or environmental controls. In Amazonian tree species, foliar P and Ca concentrations are more sensitive to environmental variation in soil availability than N and Mg concentrations (Fyllas et al ., ), and experimental nutrient addition in tropical forests show that both foliar and wood P concentrations respond more strongly to nutrient addition than do N concentrations (Harrington et al ., ; Ostertag, ; Schreeg et al ., ; Mo et al ., ). Wood Ca and P may also be more sensitive than other elements to soil conditions due to respective variation in the soil available nutrient pools, because the ranges of soil available Ca (115‐fold) and P (90‐fold) were vastly greater than the variation in Mg (38‐fold), K (20‐fold) and inorganic N (sixfold) among the 10 plots sampled (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…) and trees (Mo et al . ) suggest that changes in nutrient concentrations after nutrient addition may become more visible in older leaves, stem tissue, or roots because these tissues can be used as nutrient reservoirs and the foliar N:P ratios of young leaves need to be maintained in the range of optimal performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil is classified as a latosol developed from granite (Wang et al, ). Annual wet N deposition in the region was c. 40 kg N/ha in 2011 and 2012 (Chen et al, ; Mo et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, for every fertilizer application, 476.6 g NH 4 NO 3 (equal to 166.6 g N) and/or 808 g Na 2 HPO 4 (equal to 166.6 g P) were dissolved in 30 L groundwater and then applied to the corresponding plots uniformly using a backpack sprayer near the soil surface; 30 L of groundwater was also applied to control plots (Li et al, ; Wang et al, ). The amount of added water in each plot was equivalent to 0.08% and 0.35% of rainfall inputs in the wet and dry seasons, respectively (Mo et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%