2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of phytoplankton traits to environmental variables in French lakes: New perspectives for bioindication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study, performed in another Swiss peri-alpine lake, obtained good results for the forecast of phytoplankton and cyanobacteria distribution using an RF model (Thomas et al, 2018). On a broader level, the RF model also yielded good prediction and forecast results in freshwater environments (Derot et al, 2020;Yajima and Derot, 2018). These studies indicated that the RF model is well adapted to our current problem.…”
Section: Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent study, performed in another Swiss peri-alpine lake, obtained good results for the forecast of phytoplankton and cyanobacteria distribution using an RF model (Thomas et al, 2018). On a broader level, the RF model also yielded good prediction and forecast results in freshwater environments (Derot et al, 2020;Yajima and Derot, 2018). These studies indicated that the RF model is well adapted to our current problem.…”
Section: Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For the minimum number of observations in each node of the RF model, also called the minimum leaf size (min-leaf), we used the default setup proposed by MATLAB. This implies that the value of min-leaf is equal 5 and 1 in the regression and classifications modes, respective (Derot et al, 2020;Yajima and Derot, 2018).…”
Section: Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Viridiplantae and Alveolata had an intermediate number of ITS-SWARMS per V9-group (average number of 2.2–2.6) and a low to intermediate geographical restriction of ITS-SWARMS (42% to 52% respectively). In all taxonomic groups some taxa included certain geographically restricted ITS-SWARMS (Figure S5 42 ). Aside from indications for a geographical restriction of some subpopulations, the ITS-SWARMS also indicate an ecophysiological differentiation of clades below the resolution of V9-groups (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton was collected at the deepest point of the lakes, in the euphotic part of the water column. Taxa were determined at the species level in the laboratory and their abundances were weighted by taxa biovolume [49] using standard cell values defined in the software Phytobs [50], or measured directly from the sample if the values were lacking. Additionally, chlorophyll-a was collected from the euphotic zone during each sampling event and measured using the standard methods NF-T 90-117 [49,51,52].…”
Section: Biological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%